Solving 2^k ≡ n mod p with Modular Arithmetic

  • Thread starter Thread starter CRGreathouse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding an efficient algorithm to solve the equation 2^k ≡ n mod p, where p is an odd prime. The initial approach involves a brute-force method that can be slow, taking time proportional to p in the worst case. Participants suggest exploring faster discrete logarithm algorithms, particularly for small primes, with the baby step-giant step method being considered for improved performance. There is also a proposal to use root-finding algorithms for non-continuous functions to address the problem, although the feasibility of such methods remains uncertain. Overall, the focus is on optimizing the calculation of discrete logarithms in modular arithmetic.
CRGreathouse
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to write a program which finds a solution to 2^k\equiv n\pmod p where p is an odd prime. At the moment I'm using a program like this:

Code:
power = 2;
exp = 1;
while (power != n) {
  power = (2 * power) % p; // actually coded as an addition and conditional subtract
  if (power == 1)
    return "No solution";
  exp += 1;
}
return exp;
which can take time proportional to p in the worst case -- which is not rare. Does anyone know of a better way to do this?

Calculating the order of 2 mod p won't help -- unless it cost less than a comparison at each step, I guess. Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heh, of course. Sorry, transforming the problem into the form above took a lot of abstraction, and I totally missed the obvious connection since I was used to seeing the trees for the forest.
 
OK, follow-up now. What's the fastest discrete log algorithm for small primes? Say I wanted to calculate a discrete logarithm for various numbers mod the first ten million to one billion primes. Since the individual primes are small the powerful methods seem to be too much, but since I'm doing millions of applications speed is still relevant.

I'm going to try out baby step-giant step on this problem to see if it helps performance. Unfortunately this will slow down other parts of my program, but the gains should be worth it...?
 
CRGreathouse said:
OK, follow-up now. What's the fastest discrete log algorithm for small primes?
Lookup table. :smile: Well, I suppose it depends on what you mean by "small".
 
Hurkyl said:
Lookup table. :smile: Well, I suppose it depends on what you mean by "small".

The prime moduli would be 6-9 digits long. I'll be doing at least 6 million, and perhaps as many as a billion, total discrete log calculations. (If the algorithm turns out to be faster than expected, I might do yet more.)

Edit: And congratulations on passing 10,000 posts.
 
If you work on a language that allows bit operations, it could be helpful to convert an integer to floating-point, and extract the exponent from the IEEE representation.
 
Dodo said:
If you work on a language that allows bit operations, it could be helpful to convert an integer to floating-point, and extract the exponent from the IEEE representation.

Doesn't help. I'm looking for the discrete log in GF(p), not the binary (or natural) log over the reals.

The discrete log (base 2) of -2131 = 3 (mod 11) is 8, because 2^8 = 3 (mod 11). That 3 is 1.1 x 10^1 in binary doesn't get me there (as far as I know).
 
my idea was a bit crazier, let's suppose we want to calculate f(x)=0 mod(p)

then using Newton iterative method x_{n+1}=x_{n}- \frac{f(x_{n}}{f'(x_{n})} mod(p)

for example if through the iteration process you get 6.7890345 and p=5 then taking the previous quantity 0 mod(5) we get 1.7890345 .
 
  • #10
mhill, I don't understand. Say I wanted to find a k with 2^k = -2131 (mod 10000019). How does your method find that?
 
  • #11
i do not know , my question is to use a root-finding algorithm that allow a function f(x) to be non-continous for example your function

2^{k}+2131 is smooth, however if we impose that f(x) in your particular problem is of the form

f: \mathcal R \rightarrow (0,10000019)

then f(x) would be discontinous at the points f(x)=k10000019 for any integer 'k' . My idea was to replace the initial function f(x) by a piecewise continuous functions with discontinuties at the point 'a' so f(a)=kp in order to solve the congruences f(x)=0 mod(p) however i do not know if there exists root-finding algorithm that can deal with discontinuities.<br /> <br /> perhaps in your case we should find the roots of <br /> <br /> f(x)= frac( 2^{k}+2131)(10000019)^{-1}<br /> <br /> where frac(x) is the fractional part of &#039;x&#039;
 
Last edited:
  • #12
i do not know , my question is to use a root-finding algorithm that allow a function f(x) to be non-continous for example your function

2^{k}+2131 is smooth, however if we impose that f(x) in your particular problem is of the form

f: \mathcal R \rightarrow (0,10000019)

then f(x) would be discontinous at the points f(x)=k10000019 for any integer 'k' . My idea was to replace the initial function f(x) by a piecewise continuous functions with discontinuties at the point 'a' so f(a)=kp in order to solve the congruences f(x)=0 mod(p) however i do not know if there exists root-finding algorithm that can deal with discontinuities.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K