MHB Solving 2x2 Matrix Projection Problem: Strang's Approach

arrow27
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Many important techniques in fields such as CT and MR imaging in medicine,
nondestructive testing and scientific visualization are based on trying
to recover a matrix from its projections. A small version of the problem
is given the sums of the rows and columns of a 2 x 2 matrix, determine the
elements of the matrix. Solve this problem or show why it cannot be solved(Strang)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arrow27 said:
Many important techniques in fields such as CT and MR imaging in medicine,
nondestructive testing and scientific visualization are based on trying
to recover a matrix from its projections. A small version of the problem
is given the sums of the rows and columns of a 2 x 2 matrix, determine the
elements of the matrix. Solve this problem or show why it cannot be solved(Strang)
What have you tried so far? Have you looked at both possible outcomes? In other words, have you tried (a) to prove the result, and (b) to find a counterexample? A possible counterexample might consist of two different matrices with the same row sums and column sums.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K