MHB Solving 7x=210: Must x be a Multiple of 12?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChickenWings
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple
AI Thread Summary
To determine if x must be a multiple of 12 when 7x is a multiple of 210, the prime factorization of 210 is analyzed as 2, 3, 5, and 7. Since 7x = 210n, dividing by 7 gives x = 2 * 3 * 5 * n. This simplifies to x = 30n, indicating that x is a multiple of 30. Therefore, x does not have to be a multiple of 12, as 30 is not a multiple of 12.
ChickenWings
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Please help me understand how to get the solution to the following:

If 7x is a multiple of 210, must x be a multiple of 12?

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin by finding the prime factorization of 210, which is:

$$210=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot7$$

Now, if $7x$ is a multiple of 210, then we may write:

$$7x=210n=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot7\cdot n$$

Now dividing through by 7, we find:

$$x=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot n$$

What can you conclude from this?
 
I really appreciate your response but I'm getting lost at the "$$7x=210n=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot7\cdot n$$" mark. Sorry. :(
MarkFL said:
I would begin by finding the prime factorization of 210, which is:

$$210=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot7$$

Now, if $7x$ is a multiple of 210, then we may write:

$$7x=210n=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot7\cdot n$$

Now dividing through by 7, we find:

$$x=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot n$$

What can you conclude from this?
 
If $n$ is a natural or counting number, then the multiples of 210 can be written as $210n$. All we did is then turn the statement "7x is a multiple of 210" into an equation. :D
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top