MHB Solving 7x=210: Must x be a Multiple of 12?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChickenWings
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple
ChickenWings
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Please help me understand how to get the solution to the following:

If 7x is a multiple of 210, must x be a multiple of 12?

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin by finding the prime factorization of 210, which is:

$$210=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot7$$

Now, if $7x$ is a multiple of 210, then we may write:

$$7x=210n=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot7\cdot n$$

Now dividing through by 7, we find:

$$x=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot n$$

What can you conclude from this?
 
I really appreciate your response but I'm getting lost at the "$$7x=210n=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot7\cdot n$$" mark. Sorry. :(
MarkFL said:
I would begin by finding the prime factorization of 210, which is:

$$210=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot7$$

Now, if $7x$ is a multiple of 210, then we may write:

$$7x=210n=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot7\cdot n$$

Now dividing through by 7, we find:

$$x=2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot n$$

What can you conclude from this?
 
If $n$ is a natural or counting number, then the multiples of 210 can be written as $210n$. All we did is then turn the statement "7x is a multiple of 210" into an equation. :D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top