Solving a 2m Inclined Plane Problem with Negligible Friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a solid ball rolling down a 2-meter inclined plane with negligible friction. Participants are exploring the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy, considering both translational and rotational motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of "negligible friction" and its implications for whether the ball rolls or slides. There are attempts to derive the final velocity using energy conservation principles, with some questioning the steps taken in the calculations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to the problem, with some participants providing guidance on the calculations and clarifying assumptions. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being examined, and there is no explicit consensus on the final answer yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem's wording may lead to confusion regarding the assumptions about friction and rolling motion, which could affect the calculations and interpretations of energy conservation.

cortozld
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid ball is at the top of a 2 meter inclined plane. Assuming friction is negligible, what is its linear speed (m/s) as it reaches the bottom?


Homework Equations


PE=mgh
KE=.5mv^2
RKE=.5Iw^2
I of ball=.4mr^2
w=v/r

The Attempt at a Solution


Pretty much what i did was set PE=KE+RKE
which is mgh=.5mv^2+.5(.4mr^2)+w^2 masses cancel out and so does r when v/r is replaced with w

equation is now gh=.5v^2+.5(.4)v^2
if i solve for v i get: 2v^2=2gh/.4= v^2=gh/.4

thus v=sqrt(9.81*2/.4)

v=7.0 m/s

i really have no idea if I am doing this right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In such problems, I find statements like "assume that friction is negligible" confusing.

If friction is really negligible, then the ball slides down the incline without rolling. In that case, it might as well be replaced by a sliding block and there is no ω.

If by "assume that friction is negligible" the intent is to indicate that the ball is actually rolling without slipping but frictional losses are negligible (i.e. mechanical energy is conserved), then the problem should state so more clearly.

Your method is correct if you assume that the latter interpretation applies.
 
Yes, your second statement was correct. As for the problem not being specific it's my teacher not me so talk to him :). As for the answer apparently mine is wrong. So if you have any ideas about something I've missed I'd be glad to hear it
 
cortozld said:
equation is now gh=.5v^2+.5(.4)v^2
if i solve for v i get: 2v^2=2gh/.4= v^2=gh/.4

The first line is correct. Can you show me how you get from the first line to v2=gh/0.4?
 
From gh=.5v^2+.5(.4)v^2 I multiplied both sides by 2 to get rid of the .5: 2gh=v^2+.4v^2. Then I divided by .4 and added the v^2s together: 2gh/.4=2v^2. Divided both sides by 2 again to get: gh/.4=v^2.
 
cortozld said:
From gh=.5v^2+.5(.4)v^2 I multiplied both sides by 2 to get rid of the .5: 2gh=v^2+.4v^2. Then I divided by .4 and added the v^2s together: 2gh/.4=2v^2. Divided both sides by 2 again to get: gh/.4=v^2.

Not correct. First you add the v2, then you divide by whatever multiplies the v2. In other words, you factor out the v2 term to get v2(1+0.4).
 
So that means i have 2gh=v^2(1+.4). Then divide by (1+.4): 2gh/(1+.4)=v^2 and vinally solve for v. which is v=sqrt(2*9.81*2)/(1+.4)

so v=5.3 m/s! Thanks a lot :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K