Solving a 4-th degree polynomial

  • Thread starter Thread starter noelo2014
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree Polynomial
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the fourth-degree polynomial equation λ4 + λ3 - 3λ2 - λ + 2 = 0, which arises from a linear algebra problem. Participants suggest using the Rational Root Theorem to identify potential rational roots, specifically testing λ = 1 and λ = -2. The polynomial can be factored into (λ - 1)22 + 3λ + 2), making it easier to solve. Graphing the polynomial can also provide visual confirmation of the roots.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial equations and their degrees
  • Familiarity with the Rational Root Theorem
  • Basic knowledge of synthetic division and polynomial factoring
  • Experience with graphing functions to identify roots
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Rational Root Theorem in depth
  • Learn about synthetic division techniques for polynomial equations
  • Explore methods for graphing polynomials using tools like Desmos or a graphing calculator
  • Investigate the process of solving higher-degree polynomials analytically
USEFUL FOR

Students in linear algebra, mathematicians dealing with polynomial equations, and educators teaching polynomial factorization methods.

noelo2014
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is part of a linear algebra problem. I've found the characteristic polynomial of a matrix
however it's a degree 4 polynomial and I'm having trouble solving it

Homework Equations



λ43-3λ2-λ+2 = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I replaced λ2 with a and did some manipulation, giving me 2 equations:

a(a-3)+√a(a-1)=-2 and a(a-3)-√a(a-1)=-2

(not even sure if this is correct though). By inspection I can see that 1 is one of the solutions for a is 1 hence making λ 1 and -1 but I need a more rigorous and formal way of solving this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you do the multiplication (ax^2+bx+c)(x+d)(x+e), you will see the constant term is cde. So if you decompose the constant term of the fourth degree polynomial in all possible factors(not talking about prime ones,just any kind of factor, even fractional ones), you can find some zeroes there, if the polynomial has real zeroes.
I tried \lambda=-2 and it is a solution. So you can divide the polynomial by \lambda+2 and get a third degree polynomial. Now it is obvious that the other zero should be -1 and so you also can divide by \lambda+1. Now you have a second degree polynomial which is easy to solve. But I can readily say that the second degree factor is (\lambda-1)^2!
Of course the order in which you use the zeros doesn't matter.
 
Last edited:
It is possible to solve it in an analytical way, but usually this is not required for homework problems. Guessing zeros (based on factors of the absolute term) is perfectly acceptable.
 
Thanks for the reply, I kinda know what you mean, but not really. I see how cde make the constant term. What do you mean by "real zeros"?
 
We have a kind of numbers called Real numbers. They're the numbers we usually work with. Examples are 1,2.64,6/5,-\pi.
The equation x^2-\pi^2=0 has zeroes \pm \pi. But what about x^2+\pi^2=0?
We have x^2=-\pi^2 but you can't square a Real number and get a negative number,that's just impossible. But if we define i^2=-1, then the equation x^2+\pi^2=0 has imaginary zeroes, \pm i \pi.
You can also have complex numbers which have the form a+bi for a and b being real.
 
As the other guys said before me, in these excercises you have to guess a root of the polynomial. A nice theorem, if I remember correctly, is that if the polynomial has an integer root then it divides the last constant term. In this case, it's too. So, try by substituting λ=1,2,-1,-2. If that works, divide by λ-x, where x is the root of the polynomial.

A nicer trick is "grouping". You group terms of the equation to form a sum of identical equations. For example, in this case we have:

λ43-3λ2-λ+2=(λ43-2λ2)+(-λ2-λ+2)

Can you go it any further? :)
 
kostas230 said:
As the other guys said before me, in these excercises you have to guess a root of the polynomial. A nice theorem, if I remember correctly, is that if the polynomial has an integer root then it divides the last constant term.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RationalZeroTheorem.html
 
I'm not sure why you would replace \lambda^4 with a. It should have been obvious from the start that \lambda= 1 is a root. And then, by regular division or "synthetic division" it should be clear that \lambda^4+ \lambda^3- 3\lambda^2- \lambda+ 2= (\lambda- 1)(\lambda^3+ 2\lambda^2- \lambda- 2). And, again, it is easy to check that \lambda= 1 is a root. So, dividing again, \lambda^4+ \lambda^3- 3\lambda^2- \lambda+ 2= (\lambda- 1)^2(\lambda^2+ 3\lambda+ 2).

And that last quadratic is easy to factor. The point of this exercise is: while there exist a "formula" for solving general fourth degree polynomial equations, it is extremely complicated and it is a good idea to start by using the "rational root theorem" or "rational zero theorem" that Borek gave a link to:

"If a polynomial with integer coefficients has a rational number zero, a/b, then a must evenly divide the constant term and b must evenly divide the leading coefficient".

Here the polynomial is \lambda^4+ \lambda^3- 3\lambda^2- \lambda+ 2 which has constant term 2 and leading coefficient 1 so any rational 0 must be an integer (denominator must divide 1 so can only be \pm 1) that evenly divides 2. That is, the only possible rational roots are \pm 1 and \pm 2.

There is no guarantee that a polynomial has any rational zeros but it is worth checking because it is so difficult to find non-rational zeros!
 
You have been given many helpful suggestions.

If you have access to a graphing calculator, you could try graphing

##\displaystyle y = x^4+x^3-3 x^2-x+2\ .##

The zeros of the polynomial are readily apparent. Further, check that the roots are truly what they appear to be.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K