Solving a Complex Circuit Problem with Kirchhoff's Laws

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a complex circuit problem using Kirchhoff's laws, specifically focusing on the application of loop and junction equations in a circuit with multiple loops and resistors. Participants are exploring the relationships between currents and voltages in the circuit setup.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Kirchhoff's laws, questioning the setup of junctions and loops. There are attempts to formulate equations based on the circuit's configuration, and some participants express uncertainty about how to proceed with substitutions in their equations.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different approaches to writing loop equations and understanding the relationships between loop currents. Some participants have provided hints and suggestions for writing Kirchhoff's voltage law (KVL) equations, while others are seeking clarification on specific points and checking the correctness of their equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the amount of direct assistance they can receive. There is also a focus on understanding the implications of calculated currents and potential differences in the circuit.

mopar969
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Please see attachment for problem. I know Kirchhoff laws and resistors in parallel and series but how do you solve this?
 

Attachments

  • scan0001.jpg
    scan0001.jpg
    28 KB · Views: 486
Physics news on Phys.org
I thought that maybe I could use kirckoffs laws for this problem but I am unsure if this is a good idea to start?
 
Is there a nodal point in the middle of the circuit?

Yes, it is a good idea to apply Kirchhoff's rules.

ehild
 
Since there is a point in the middle of the circuit where all the voltages meet what will be the currents for the four loops and the outer loop?
 
mopar969 said:
Since there is a point in the middle of the circuit where all the voltages meet what will be the currents for the four loops and the outer loop?

Isn't that what you're supposed to calculate? There are four loops, so you can write four equations in four unknowns to find the loop currents. Then use the loop currents to determine the individual currents in the components.
 
I am having trouble knowing what junctions to substitute into what loop equations.
Here are my equations:
Junctions:
J1:I2=I6+I1
J2:I3=I2+I5
J3:I1+I8=I4
J4:I4+I7=I3
J5:I5+I6=I7+I8

Loops:
L1:1=-I1+6I6+8I8
L2:2=-2I2+5I5-6I6
L3:3=-3I3-7I7-5I5
L4:4=-4I4-8I8+7I7
L5:10=-4I4-I1-2I2-3I3

Can you give a hint on where to start for a substitution in this problem?
 
mopar969 said:
I am having trouble knowing what junctions to substitute into what loop equations.

<snip>

Can you give a hint on where to start for a substitution in this problem?

I suggest that you write KVL equations for the loops. That is, you know that the sum of the voltage rises and drops around any given loop is zero. Attached you'll find my suggestion for the choice of loops.
 

Attachments

  • Loop2.jpg
    Loop2.jpg
    13.3 KB · Views: 424
My first four loops are the same as your pic. My fifth loop is just around the outside perimeter. I was just curious if you could give me a hint on where to start my substitution to get something to cancel?
 
I understand, but it would be simpler to write just the four equations pertaining to the loops that I indicated with the red arrows. Each of those red arrows represents a loop current. The total current in any given component is the sum (watch the directions!) of the individual loop currents that pass through that component. So, for example, the current through the 3 Ohm resistor would be I3, while the current through the 5 Ohm resistor would be I3 - I2 flowing from the center node to the junction with the 3 and 2 Ohm resistors.

I'll start you off by writing the equation for loop 1. The main loop current here is i1 which flows through all of the components in the loop, while the 6 Ohm resistor also carries i2, and the 8 Ohm resistor also carries i4. So, equating the voltage rise due to the 1V supply in the loop to the sum of the voltage drops across the resistors,

1V = 1Ω*i1 + 6Ω*(i1 - i2) + 8Ω*(i1 - i4)

and rearranging to separate the currents:

1V = i1*(1 + 6 + 8)Ω - i2*6Ω - i4*8Ω

Once you've written the equations for the other three loops, solve for i1 through i4. Then using these loop currents, find the individual currents in the components.
 
  • #10
Loop 2: 2v=(2+5+6)I2-6I1-5I3
Loop 3:3v=(3+5+7)I3-5I2-7I4
Loop 4:(4+8+7)I4-8I1-7I3

I wanted to check and see if these were correct before I continue?
 
  • #11
mopar969 said:
Loop 2: 2v=(2+5+6)I2-6I1-5I3
Loop 3:3v=(3+5+7)I3-5I2-7I4
Loop 4:(4+8+7)I4-8I1-7I3

I wanted to check and see if these were correct before I continue?

Yes, that's fine, but don't forget the voltage in Loop 4.
 
  • #12
Oops sorry the voltage for loop 4 is 4 but I do not see how to solve for I1 through I4 using these loops?
 
  • #13
mopar969 said:
Oops sorry the voltage for loop 4 is 4 but I do not see how to solve for I1 through I4 using these loops?

Four equations in four unknowns. You must have solved simultaneous equations before?
 
  • #14
I couldn't figure the problem out with substitutions so I set up a matrix and got 1 amp for all four currents is this correct? Also this would mean that there would be zero current through the 5, 6, 7, and 8 ohm resistors. Please explain how this would be possible?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
mopar969 said:
I couldn't figure the problem out with substitutions so I set up a matrix and got 1 amp for all four currents is this correct? Also this would mean that there would be zero current through the 5, 6, 7, and 8 ohm resistors. Please explain how this would be possible?

Yes, 1 amp for each of the loop currents is correct, and yes, zero current in the inner resistors is correct. It's possible because there is no potential difference driving current though them; the circuit just happens to be balanced that way. Remember, zero is a perfectly good number, too!
 
  • #16
I am just a little confused by what you meant by their is no potential difference. Can you expand on why this makes on current on the inner resistors?
 
  • #17
If it so happens that the potential at each corner of the outer loop is the same, then there will be no potential difference between any pair of them to drive current through the inner resistors.

Pick a corner node as a point of reference. Using the loop currents that you calculated (each is 1 amp; pay attention to its direction) calculate the voltage at the adjacent corners with respect to your reference node.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K