Solving a complex equation involving conjugates with Mathematica

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving complex equations involving conjugates using Mathematica, specifically the equation z Conjugate[z] = 1. Users encountered errors such as InverseFunction::ifun and Solve::tdep, indicating that Mathematica struggles with non-algebraic forms. The recommended approach when Solve fails is to utilize the Reduce function, which is more effective for complex equations with multiple terms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Mathematica 12.3 syntax and functions
  • Understanding of complex numbers and conjugates
  • Knowledge of algebraic vs. non-algebraic equations
  • Experience with the Reduce function in Mathematica
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the Reduce function in Mathematica for solving complex equations
  • Learn about handling complex conjugates in Mathematica
  • Investigate error messages in Mathematica, specifically InverseFunction::ifun and Solve::tdep
  • Study advanced equation-solving techniques in Mathematica
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, researchers, and professionals who require solutions to complex equations involving conjugates, particularly those using Mathematica for computational tasks.

GargleBlast42
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
How can one obtain (using Mathematica) all the solutions of an equation involving conjugates like for example z \bar{z}=1. Although this equation is very simple, it seems that Mathematica is not able to handle it. I obtain:
Code:
Solve[z Conjugate[z] == 1, z]
InverseFunction::ifun: Inverse functions are being used. Values may be lost for multivalued inverses. >>
Solve::tdep: The equations appear to involve the variables to be solved for in an essentially non-algebraic way. >>
Solve[z z^\[Conjugate]\[LongEqual]1,z]
Of course I'm not interested in this particularly simple equation, but of an equation involving many terms, which can't be, unfortunately, done by hand in a reasonable amount of time.
Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When Solve fails, especially with the non-algebraic error, I usually use Reduce.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K