Solving a Limits Question in Schaum's: Uncovering the Answer of 1/(2*sqrt(3))

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eprjenkins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a limits question from Schaum's, specifically finding the limit of the expression lim(x>0) ((sqrt(x+3))-(sqrt(3))/x, which evaluates to 1/(2*sqrt(3)). The key technique discussed is multiplying by the conjugate, (sqrt(x+3)+sqrt(3))/(sqrt(x+3)+sqrt(3)), to eliminate the denominator and simplify the expression. This method is particularly useful for resolving indeterminate forms like 0/0. Additionally, the limit represents the derivative of the square root function evaluated at 3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with the concept of derivatives
  • Knowledge of rationalizing expressions using conjugates
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating square roots
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of rationalizing expressions in calculus
  • Learn about derivatives and their applications in limits
  • Explore the concept of indeterminate forms in calculus
  • Practice solving limits involving square roots and conjugates
USEFUL FOR

Students learning calculus, particularly those focusing on limits and derivatives, as well as educators seeking to clarify these concepts for their students.

eprjenkins
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I have been reading through Schaum's and came across a limits question that i cannot figure out. I thought it had no limit but the answer is 1/(2*sqrt(3)). I have no idea of how to use latex so I will attempt it using basic characters; hopefully not to obscure.

lim(x>0) ((sqrt(x+3))-(sqrt(3))/x

I cannot see how to simplify in order to get rid of the denominator x.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Multiply the whole thing by (sqrt(x+3)+sqrt(3))/(sqrt(x+3)+sqrt(3)). This is called multiplying by the conjugate and its often useful. The effect is to "switch" the square roots from denom to num. (or vice versa) and to take the arguments of the square roots "out of them". Understandable?
 
Merci beaucoup, all is clear. If not too difficult can you give me a definition of the conjugate? Maybe its in this book...
 
eprjenkins said:
Merci beaucoup, all is clear. If not too difficult can you give me a definition of the conjugate? Maybe its in this book...

"conjugate" may mean several things. But in this particular case, say, we have the expression: \sqrt{a} + \sqrt{b}, then its conjugate is: \sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b}, or \sqrt{b} - \sqrt{a}.

This is a common practice in taking the limit of something, especially in the form 0 / 0. Since you can factor a polynomial, but not a surd. So, what you should do is to rationalize it, i.e eliminate the square roots.
 
This is some circular logic here but in case you just wanted to value and not how to prove it, you could recognize that the limit you stated is the definition for the derivative of the square root function evaluated at 3.
 
Thank you all. Gib Z, I have only begun limits; but I'm sure I'll get to derivatives and the like soon, only a few chapters away.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K