Solving a Nonlinear Differential Equation Using Bernoulli's Method

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the nonlinear differential equation \(\frac{dr}{dt} = r(u - r)\) using Bernoulli's method. The user successfully transforms the equation into a linear form by substituting \(w = \frac{1}{r}\), leading to the equation \(\frac{dw}{dt} + uw = 1\). The integrating factor \(e^{ut}\) is identified, resulting in the solution \(r = \frac{ur_0}{r_0 + ue^{-ut}}\). The user also explores an alternative method of separation of variables, integrating \(\frac{dr}{r(u - r)} = dt\) and manipulating the resulting logarithmic expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nonlinear differential equations
  • Familiarity with Bernoulli's method for solving differential equations
  • Knowledge of integrating factors in linear differential equations
  • Basic skills in integration techniques, including partial fractions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Bernoulli's method in various differential equations
  • Learn about integrating factors and their role in solving linear differential equations
  • Explore separation of variables in greater depth, particularly for nonlinear equations
  • Review examples from "Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equations" by Jordan and Smith for practical applications
USEFUL FOR

Students studying differential equations, mathematicians focusing on nonlinear dynamics, and educators teaching advanced calculus concepts.

syj
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[itex]\frac{dr}{dt}=r(u-r)[/itex]

Homework Equations



i rewrote this as [itex]\frac{dr}{dt}-ur=-r^2[/itex]

i think this is like bernoulli's equation



The Attempt at a Solution


so i let [itex]w=\frac{1}{r}[/itex] so that [itex]r=\frac{1}{w}[/itex]
this gives me

[itex]\frac{dr}{dt}=-1w^{-2}\frac{dw}{dt}[/itex]

so now i have
[itex]-w^{-2}\frac{dw}{dt}-uw^{-1}=-w^{-2}[/itex]

if i divide by [itex]-w^{-2}[/itex]

then i get a linear differential equation

[itex]\frac{dw}{dt}+uw=1[/itex]

the integrating factor is [itex]e^{ut}[/itex]

so i get [itex]w=\frac{1}{u}+w_0e^{-ut}[/itex]

from my definition of [itex]w[/itex] i have [itex]w_0=\frac{1}{r_0}[/itex] and [itex]w=\frac{1}{r}[/itex]

so i get [itex]r=\frac{ur_0}{r_0+ue^{-ut}}[/itex]

is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
check by differentiating and comparing to the original DE

note this equation is separable, so you could do it by direct integration
 
please explain how i would solve by separation.
thanks
 
[tex] \frac{dr}{dt}=r(u-r)[/tex]

gives
[tex] \int \frac{dr}{r(u-r)}=\int dt[/tex]

though even if you can solve the integral (partial fractions may be a good start) it may be difficult to get into an analytic function for r(t)
 
[tex]\frac{dr}{dt}= r(u-r)[/tex]
with u constant.

[tex]\frac{dr}{r(u-r)}= dt[/tex]

Integrate the left side with respect to r and the right side with respect to t.

( I really hate it when lanedance gets in one or two minutes ahead of me but to have him first with exactly the same timestand- arrrgh!)
 
ok so i get
[itex]\frac{ln(r)-ln(r-u)}{u}=t[/itex]

which i then manipulate (or try to at least ) to get:
[itex] ln\frac{r}{r-u}=ut[/itex]

if this is correct then i think i can do:
[itex] \frac{r}{r-u}=e^{ut}[/itex]

i know something is wrong cos i don't have [itex]r_0[/itex]

im working through an example in jordan and smith (nonlinear ordinary differential equations)
so i know what the answer should be, I am trying to get to it tho.
:(
please please correc this.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K