Solving a polynomial with complex properties

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that zn + z-n = 2cos(nθ) using de Moivre's Theorem and solving the polynomial equation 3z4 - z3 + 4z2 - z + 3 = 0 for complex z. The equation is simplified by substituting terms involving cosθ, leading to the quadratic 6cos2θ - cosθ - 1 = 0. The roots are found to be cosθ = 1/2 and cosθ = -1/3, yielding corresponding angles for θ. The final complex roots of the polynomial are derived, with a note on verifying solutions by substituting back into the original equation. Additionally, a side discussion arises regarding the definition of strictly increasing functions and the inclusion of points where the gradient is zero.
moocav
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If z = cosθ + isinθ, show that zn + z-n = 2cosnθ. Hence solve the equation 3z4 - z3 + 4z2 - z + 3 = 0 for complex z.
(Hint: Reduce the given equation to an equation with the unknown cosθ)


Homework Equations


z = cosθ + isinθ
zn + z-n = 2cos(nθ)
3z4 - z3 + 4z2 - z + 3 = 0
cos2θ = 2cos2θ - 1

The Attempt at a Solution


From de Moivre's Theorem
zn = cos(nθ) + isin(nθ) AND z-n = cos(-nθ) + isin(-nθ) = cos(nθ) - isin(nθ)
Hence zn + z-n
= cos(nθ) + isin(nθ) + cos(nθ) - isin(nθ)
= 2cos(nθ)

3z4 - z3 + 4z2 - z + 3 = 0
Divide both sides by z2
3z2 - z + 4 - z-1 + 3z-2 = 0

Rearranging to
3z2 + 3z-2 - z - z-1 + 4 = 0
3(z2 + z-2) - (z + z-1) + 4 = 0

Using zn + z-n = 2cos(nθ)
3(2cos2θ) - (2cosθ) + 4 = 0

Substituting cos2θ = 2cos2θ - 1
3(2[2cos2θ - 1]) - 2cosθ + 4 = 0

Simplifies down to
6cos2θ - cosθ - 1 = 0

Solving for cosθ
(2cosθ - 1)(3cosθ + 1) = 0
Therefore cosθ = 1/2 OR cosθ = -1/3
cosθ = 1/2, θ = π/3 or 5π/3
cosθ = -1/3, θ = cos-1(-1/3)
(Note: π = funny looking pi)

Hence (using complex conjugate is also a root of polynomial)
z1 = 1/2 + sqrt(3)/2 i
z2 = 1/2 - sqrt(3)/2 i
z3 = -1/3 + sin[cos-1(-1/3)] i
z4 = -1/3 - sin[cos-1(-1/3)] i

I'm pretty confident that I've done it right until the cosθ = -1/3 and getting sin[cos-1(-1/3)] in the roots z3 and z4. So my question is have I the whole question correctly? If not can you show me how it should be done. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You did it correctly, though you should simplify sin[arccos(-1/3)]. You can always check your answers by plugging them back into the original equation.
 
Ok thankyou (:

umm another question unrelated
but now I have another concern

for a function to be STRICTLY increasing, is the point 0 actually included? Because me and my friends all have different opinions. So the gradient at x = 0 is 0 so would the function still be considered as strictly increasing if it included x=0?
 
Strictly increasing means f'(x)>0 for all x. If you have f'(x)≥0, the function is monotonically increasing.
 
Just to add one point to your original post, when I did questions like these in Further Math, it was always best to show that z=0 was not a root before dividing by any power of z.
 

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K