Solving a Puzzling Limit Problem

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Buri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit of the expression lim {x-> infinity} (x² + 2x)^(1/2) - x. Participants explore different methods to approach the problem, including manipulation of the expression and the use of conjugates, while addressing the concept of indeterminate forms in limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to simplify the limit by manipulating the expression, leading to an "infinity times zero" form, which they believe results in zero.
  • Another participant points out that "infinity times zero" is undefined and suggests representing infinity and zero in limit terms to clarify the reasoning.
  • Some participants recommend using L'Hopital's rule to handle indeterminate forms, while others suggest multiplying by the conjugate as a more straightforward method.
  • A participant expresses confusion about breaking limits into products of individual limits, questioning the conditions under which such operations are valid.
  • There is a discussion about the Taylor series expansion of the square root function as an alternative method to evaluate the limit.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to handle indeterminate forms with care, but there is no consensus on the best method to evaluate the limit, as multiple approaches are discussed and debated.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the application of limit properties, particularly in cases involving infinity and zero, and the discussion includes various mathematical techniques without resolving which is the most appropriate for this specific limit problem.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in advanced calculus, particularly those studying limits and indeterminate forms, may find the discussion beneficial.

Buri
Messages
271
Reaction score
0
A limit problem!

I was trying to calculate the following limit:

lim {x-> infinity} (x² + 2x)^(1/2) - x

I manipulate f(x) in such a way:

f(x) = (x² + 2x)^(1/2) - x
f(x) = [x²(1 + 2/x)]^(1/2) - x
f(x) = |x|(1 + 2/x)^(1/2) - x

As x goes to infinity |x| = x. Therefore,

f(x) = x( [1 + 2/x]^(1/2) - 1 ]

After taking the limit I'm getting infinity times 0 which would mean the limit is equal to zero (I think). However, this isn't the right answer and the way I was supposed to do it was multiply f(x) by its "conjugate" to get the limit as equal to 1. But, I've tried figuring out why I can't do the above, but I just don't see it. So I'd appreciate the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Buri said:
...I'm getting infinity times 0 which would mean the limit is equal to zero (I think).

Here is your mistake. You must remember that infinity is not a number.

in your function f(x) = x( [1 + 2/x]^(1/2) - 1 ] you have, as you point out, one portion going to infinity and the other going to zero. Think of it this way:

How, in a limit sense, can you represent infinity? Easy: lim {x-> infinity} x

How, in a limit sense, can you represent zero? Easy: lim {x-> infinity} 1/x

What happens when you combine the two?

lim {x-> infinity} x* 1/x

which is the same as:

lim {x-> infinity} 1

which is 1.

Now, the above is not how you would prove lim {x-> infinity} (x² + 2x)^(1/2) - x=1.

Have you tried multiplying the function by its conjugate (do you know what that means)?
 
Last edited:


Multiply and divide by [itex]\sqrt{x^{2} + 2 x} + x[/itex] and use the rule [itex](a - b)(a + b) = a^{2} - b^{2}[/itex] in the denominator.
 


Buri said:
After taking the limit I'm getting infinity times 0 which would mean the limit is equal to zero

There is your problem. "Infinity times zero" is an undefined number, precisely because you would be able to get it equal to anything you'd like. For example, consider the limit
[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} \left( x \cdot \frac{a}{x} \right)[/tex]
which would be equal to 0 by your reasoning (x goes to infinity while a/x goes to 0 for any number a, including a = 0)

Of course, first simplifying, you see that it is
[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{a x}{x} = \lim_{x \to \infty} a = a[/tex]

Moral to the story: Whenever you encounter undefined forms in limit operations (like 0/0, or 0 . infinity) you need to exercise more care.
 


It's already been explained why infinity times zero isn't necessarily zero. The usual way to deal with indeterminate forms is to use L'Hopital's rule. If

[tex]\lim{x\rightarrow \infty} f(x)g(x) = \infty 0[/tex],

then consider f(x)/(1/g(x)). The limit of this is [/itex]\infty/\infty[/itex], so by L'Hopital's rule

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} f(x)g(x) = \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac{f(x)}{1/g(x)} = \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac{f'(x)}{(1/g(x))'}[/tex].

There are other ways to evaluate the limit. You were asked to use a conjugate method, which Dickfore gave. Another method is to consider that for x positive

f(x) = x( [1 + 2/x]^(1/2) - 1 ]

is exact. Since 1/x is small, though, you can expand the square root function [itex](1 + 2/x)^{1/2}[/itex] in a taylor series about 1/x = 0. Try that too. (It is easier than L'Hopital's rule).
 


Thanks a lot guys! I had actually done it by multiplying it by its conjugate, but I didn't see why I couldn't do it the way I did it above. I hadn't noticed that lim x * a/x shows my reasoning is incorrect. Thanks a lot for the help!
 


CompuChip said:
There is your problem. "Infinity times zero" is an undefined number, precisely because you would be able to get it equal to anything you'd like. For example, consider the limit
[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} \left( x \cdot \frac{a}{x} \right)[/tex]

Just another question. Why is it that I can't break the above limit as follows:

lim x * lim a/x

Is it because lim x doesn't exist? Does the limit property for the product of two functions only apply when the individual limits exist?
 


Buri said:
Just another question. Why is it that I can't break the above limit as follows:

lim x * lim a/x
Precisely for the reason I show in my post: it would give an undeterminate form (0 x infinity).

Is it because lim x doesn't exist? Does the limit property for the product of two functions only apply when the individual limits exist?

Yep, it is true that if
[tex]\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L_f[/tex]
and
[tex]\lim_{x \to a} g(x) = L_g[/tex]
where Lf and Lg are numbers (even zero is allowed, but - again - infinity is not a number) then
[tex]\lim_{x \to a} f(x) \cdot g(x) = L_f \cdot L_g[/tex]
and
[tex]\lim_{x \to a} f(x) / g(x) = L_f / L_g[/tex]
(as long as Lg is not zero).
 


Okay, thanks for your help! :)
 
  • #10


Buri said:
Just another question. Why is it that I can't break the above limit as follows:

lim x * lim a/x

Is it because lim x doesn't exist? Does the limit property for the product of two functions only apply when the individual limits exist?

Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K