Solving a Robotic Transport Challenge: Stumped on Spherical Tyres

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of implementing spherical tyres for a robotic transport vehicle project. Participants explore various concepts related to the design, functionality, and potential mechanisms for achieving movement with spherical tyres, including magnetic levitation and friction-coupled systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about using spherical tyres and suggests magnetic force as a potential solution, but notes the impossibility of monopoles.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the specific problem and suggests that a truly spherical wheel could roll in any direction, referencing furniture casters.
  • A suggestion is made that the spherical tyre needs to be caged within a slightly-more-than-hemispherical holder, with a steerable friction-coupled drive wheel for turning.
  • Participants reference the concept of a mouse ball as a relatable example for the design of the spherical tyre.
  • One participant proposes using a round magnetic levitation system with a core of iron to suspend and rotate the tyre, claiming it would reduce friction and improve responsiveness.
  • A participant mentions a prototype of a "spherical electric motor" that uses permanent magnets and solenoids, discussing the complexity of the controller needed for operation and the potential for levitation.
  • Another participant suggests lining the rim of the outer hemisphere with ball bearings to reduce friction and allows for various drive systems to be used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views and approaches to the problem, with no consensus reached on a single solution or method for implementing spherical tyres.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention specific technical challenges, such as the need for effective heat removal from solenoids and the arrangement of magnets and solenoids, which remain unresolved. The discussion also highlights the dependency on the definitions of terms like "spherical tyre" and "levitation."

stumped
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I had planned to use spherical tyres for my engg. project on a robotic transport vehicle, but I'm stumped on how to get it done. Magnetic force could be an answer but monopoles are not possible...i'm stumped...Could someone provide me the answer:??:bugeye: thethi.hs@gmail.com
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Perhaps you could be a little more specific. What problem are you having?

You mean you want a tire that can roll in any direction (no axle)?

Have a look a furniture casters. One type is a truly spherical wheel.
 
If you indeed mean that the tire is free to rotate in any direction, then it will have to be caged within a slightly-more-than-hemispherical holder. A steerable friction-coupled drive wheel could then be used to turn it.
 
Just think of your mouse ball...
 
DaveC426913 said:
Have a look a furniture casters. One type is a truly spherical wheel.
brewnog said:
Just think of your mouse ball...
Yeah. Or that.

I am such an old fogey...
 
The only reason I thought of a mouse ball was Danger's friction drive comment, - the little sensor wheels in your mouse could potentially be used as drive instead.

Now who's the old fogey, still using a ball mouse!
 
new here but what about treating it like a round mag lev. buy using a center core of iron or some other metal. you could suspend the tire and also rotate it buy means of manipulation of the magnetic field, Near Zero Friction, No Drive to wheel traction issues and very quick response!
 
Hi,

I've seen a working prototype of a "spherical electric motor" (on some university website I think, but I forget the URL), so it can be done. However, it wasn't the simplest of constructions.

As far as I remember, the concept was to use permanent magnets for the rotor, mounted on the inside of the "wheel globe" (the rotating sphere) together with solenoids (flat wound) for the stator, mounted inside a slightly larger hemisphere (you only need it to be more-than-hemispherical if you need to be able to lift the vehicle without leaving behind the "wheel globe").

The real trick, as far as I remember, was to make a controller for the solenoids, since this involves "sensing" the approaching permanent magnets, and then, depending on the direction of travel, activating the solenoids at the right time (and with the right polarity of course).

The result was a sphere (which I guess could be rubber, although they used hard plastic for their prototype) which could be rotated in any direction. I don't remember if the sphere would also "levitate" (ie. not touch the outer hemisphere when operating), or if they simply used some small casters to maintain the spacing between the sphere and the hemisphere. I guess the former would be possible, providing the solenoids and permanent magnets are strong enough (and that you are willing to spend extra energy for this purpose).

As far as I remember, the placement of the magnets and the solenoids wasn't very important, as the controller would have to "adapt" to the circumstances anyway, since no arrangement will provide a regular "pattern" for all possible rotational directions. Of course, a reasonably regular spacing is important. Also it might be important that the magnets and solenoids are placed in such a manner as to prevent a situation where all the solenoids are in the same position relative to the magnets (I guess this would be a matter of using two different "geometric patterns" for the solenoids and the magnets?)

Note that the prototype used a sphere roughly 10-15 inches in diameter, so it was a rather big "wheel". I guess that a smaller one could be made, but it would probably require quite small magnets and solenoids, which would still need to provide a decent amount of magnetism. Also the heat from the solenoids would need to be removed efficiently, as most permanent magnets are quite heat sensitive (ie. they will loose their magnetism if heated too much), but this might be a minor problem as the magnets are placed in the rotating sphere, while the solenoids are placed on the static hemisphere, so they aren't in very close contact, and not for extended periods (assuming the "wheel" is in constant motion and/or that the solenoids are switched off when standing still = not used to "hover in place").


Regards,

Inventus.
 
Line the rim of the outer hemisphere with embedded ball bearings to give the sphere low friction, and use whatever drive system you want.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
16K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K