Solving a Series Circuit with Unequal Resistor Powers

[crom1]

Homework Statement

Two resistors of equal rated voltages $V_n$, and different rated powers $P_{n1}= 50 W$ and $P_{n2}= 100 W$ are connected in series on source of rated voltage. Find total power of a circuit.

Homework Equations

[/B]$P=\frac{U^2}{R}$, $R=R_1+R_2$

The Attempt at a Solution

I am not quite sure what rated voltage is. I mean if two resistors have same voltage, and are connected in series, shouldn't they have same power? (obviously the word "rated" makes some difference but I don't know how).
My attempt was that using that voltage of a source is sum of voltages of the resistors (which it really is in series ) and using *relevant equations* but instead of getting $P=33.33 W$ I get $P=133.33 W$ . I notice that If $V_{source}= V_{n}$ I would get the right result.
Any help?

 

[CWatters]

If the rated voltage Vn is applied to a resistor it will dissipate the rated power.

Try writing equations for R1 and R2 in terms of Vn and Pn.
Then try drawing the new circuit. The problem says the voltage source is also Vn
How would you normally simplify a circuit with two resistors in series?
Note the problem statement only asks for the total power.

 

[Hesch]

If the rated voltage Vn is applied to a resistor it will dissipate the rated power.

That's generally not correct.
I've had a look at some SMD-resistors ( 0.125W ), and for all resistors Vn = 100Vdc though the resistor values are within a range of 1Ω to 1MΩ.
The Vn value is determined from the max. field strength (V/m) and thus from the mechanical size of the resistor, not from the power.

 

[CWatters]

Agreed. But I think it's the only way to solve this problem.

 

[berkeman]

Agreed -- it's a strangely worded problem.

@crom1 -- can you upload a scan of the problem?

 

[crom1]

The original problem is not in english. (unless someone here doesn't know croatian I don't see a point in posting it). I don't see a mistake in my translation but it is possible there is a mistake, I will try to ask maybe on some croatian forum to see if the problem makes sense.

 

[CWatters]

I notice that If Vsource =Vn V_{source}= V_{n} I would get the right result.

Don't go because I think you have the right answer.

This is how I approached it...

P = V²/R
so
R₁ = V_n²/50
R₂ = V_n²/100

In the new circuit you have R₁ and R₂ in series with V_n so the new power P_T is

P_T = V_n²/ (V_n²/50 + V_n²/100)

V_n² cancels

P_T = 1 / (1/50 + 1/100)
= 33.33 W

 

[crom1]

Don't go because I think you have the right answer.

This is how I approached it...

P = V²/R
so
R₁ = V_n²/50
R₂ = V_n²/100

In the new circuit you have R₁ and R₂ in series with V_n so the new power P_T is

P_T = V_n²/ (V_n²/50 + V_n²/100)

V_n² cancels

P_T = 1 / (1/50 + 1/100)
= 33.33 W

Yes, I noticed that solving it like that, I would get the right answer. But I have question, if the voltage of a source is $V_n$, then how come the voltages on the resistors are also $V_n$, since in series we have that $V_{source}=V_1+V_2$ and in this case it would be$V_n+V_n= V_n$?

 

[CWatters]

But I have question, if the voltage of a source is V n V_n, then how come the voltages on the resistors are also Vn

That's not correct. In the final circuit the voltage source is Vn (from the problem statement) but the voltage on each resistor is not Vn. I'm not sure it's even possible to work out the voltage on each resistor based on the info given. See next post.

They carefully choose the voltage source to be Vn just so that it would cancel later. It's one of those problems that tries to fool you into thinking you don't have enough information but in reality it's been carefully crafted so that the info you think is missing isn't actually needed.

 

[CWatters]

Actually I think you can write an equation for the voltage on each resistor in the final circuit..

The potential divider rule can be used to write...

V₁ = V_n * R₁/(R₁+R₂)...(1)
V₂ = V_n * R₂/(R₁+R₂)...(2)

We know from the problem statement..
R₁ = V_n²/50
R₂ = V_n²/100

Substitute into 1...

V₁ = V_n * V_n²/50 / (V_n²/50 + V_n²/100)
V_n² cancel leaving
V₁ = V_n * 1/50 / (1/50 + 1/100)
which further simplifies to
V₁ = 2/3 * V_n
and so
V₂ = 1/3 * V_n

 

[crom1]

One thing is unclear to me.
Why is
$R_1 = \frac{V_n^2}{50}$
$R_2 = \frac{V_n^2}{100 }$

and not $R_1=\frac{V_1^2}{50}$ ?

 

[CWatters]

Why is
R₁ =V_n²/50
R₂ =V_n²/100

The problem statement effectively describes two situations. Resistors tested on their own and then used in a circuit.

The problem statement says (implies) that when each resistor is tested on it's own it dissipates the rated power P_n at the rated voltage V_n. That gives you a way to write an equation for the resistance that you can later use to solve the other circuit..

P_n = V_n/R_n
and
R_n = V_n/P_n

It also says that the rated voltage V_n is the same for both resistors so no need to replace the "n" in V_n with a 1 or 2 because when tested on their own V₁=V₂=V_n.

and not
R₁ =V₁²/50

You can't use..

R₁ =V₁²/50

in the circuit with both resistors because the power dissipated in R₁ (R₂) is no longer 50W (100W).

 

[crom1]

That makes sense. Thanks CWatters