Solving a Simple Diff. Eq: Block in a Frictionless Ring

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a differential equation related to a block sliding inside a frictionless ring. The forces acting on the block are analyzed using polar coordinates, leading to a nonlinear differential equation. A substitution of variables is suggested to simplify the equation, allowing for the calculation of angular velocity over time. The correct expression for angular position is derived, emphasizing the need for dimensionless arguments in logarithmic functions. The final result for the angular position is confirmed as θ = ln(1 + ω₀μt).
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


This problem involves solving a simple differential equation. A block of mass ##m## slides on a frictionless table. It is constrained to move inside a ring of radius ##l## that is fixed to the table. At t = 0, the block is moving along the inside of the ring (in the tangential direction) with velocity ##v_0##. The coefficient of friction between the block and the ring is ##\mu##. Find the velocity of the block at later times

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So we start by simply identifying the forces on the body in the plane of rotation (since the normal force on the table cancels with gravitational force). So we have the normal force on the block from the ring, and we have the frictional force between the block and the ring. Using polar coordinates, we find that

In the radial direction:
##-N_r = m(\ddot{r} - r \dot{\theta}^2)##
##\ddot{r} = 0##
Thus
##N_r = mr \dot{\theta}^2##

In the tangential direction:
##-f_{friction} = m(r \ddot{\theta} + 2 \dot{r} \dot{\theta})##
##\dot{r} = 0##
Thus
##f = -mr \ddot{\theta}##

Since we have kinetic friction, ##f = \mu_k N_r##

So

##\mu m r \dot{\theta}^2 = mr \ddot{\theta}##

##\ddot{\theta} + \mu \dot{\theta}^2 = 0##However, this is a nonlinear differential equation, so it can't be the answer. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose you let ω = dθ/dt. Substitute and get a diff. eq. in ω. Can you solve that one first?
 
kuruman said:
Suppose you let ω = dθ/dt. Substitute and get a diff. eq. in ω. Can you solve that one first?
So if I do as you say, would I get ##\displaystyle \frac{1}{\omega} - \frac{1}{\omega_0} = -\mu t##? To get velocity explicitly would I make the substitution ##\omega = \frac{v}{r}##?
 
Yep.
 
kuruman said:
Yep.
Cool, thanks! I made a big deal out of nothing
 
kuruman said:
Yep.
One more thing, if I find ##\theta##, which I found to be ##\displaystyle \frac{1}{\mu} \ln|\mu t + \frac{1}{\omega_0}|##, how would I then find the position for any time t?
 
What position are you talking about? Here, the mass is going around in a circle therefore the only position that makes sense is the angular position as a function of time. That's θ(t) which you have attempted to find. I say "attempted" because your expression is incorrect. The argument of the logarithm must be dimensionless and yours is not.
 
Last edited:
##\displaystyle -\frac{1}{\omega} + \frac{1}{\omega_0} = -\mu t##
##\displaystyle \frac{1}{\omega} = \mu t + \frac{1}{\omega_0}##
##\displaystyle \omega = \frac{1}{\mu t + \frac{1}{\omega_0}}##
##\displaystyle \frac{d \theta}{dt} = \frac{1}{\mu t + \frac{1}{\omega_0}}##
##\displaystyle \int_{\theta_0}^{\theta} d \theta = \int_0^t \frac{1}{\mu t + \frac{1}{\omega_0}} dt##
##\displaystyle \theta - \theta_0 = \frac{1}{\mu} \ln|\mu t + \frac{1}{\omega_0}|##

What am I doing wrong?
 
Forget the absolute value of the argument of the log. Just evaluate the log at the upper limit and subtract from it the log evaluated at the lower limit. Then observe that the difference of the two logs is the log of the ratio of the arguments, a dimensionless quantity.
 
  • #10
Can't believe I didn't see that. So the answer would be ##\theta = ln(1 + \omega_0 \mu t)##?
 
  • #11
It would be that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K