Solving a Vector Triangle Differential Equation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a vector triangle differential equation derived from a circular path at angle theta. The equation can be rearranged to express (r thetadot)^2 in terms of other variables, leading to a quadratic form. Participants suggest using the small k approximation to simplify the equation and retain relevant terms up to k^2. It is noted that while the presence of a sin(theta) * thetadot term complicates direct application of the quadratic formula, it can still be managed by manipulating the equation. The overall goal is to integrate the solution from theta = 0 to theta = 2pi.
phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Homework Statement
See picture below
Relevant Equations
Cosine rule,
Speed vector equation
Screenshot 2021-03-10 at 11.20.08 AM.png

By considering a vector triangle at any point on its circular path, at angle theta from the x -axis,

We can obtain that:
(rw)^2 + (kV)^2 - 2(rw)(kV)cos(90 + theta) = V^2

This can be rearranged to get:
(r thetadot)^2 + (kV)^2 + 2 (r* thetadot)(kV)sin theta = V^2.

I know that I must somehow solve this differential equation in theta, and integrate from theta = 0 to theta = 2pi.

How do I solve this equation?

Thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Fikremariam
Physics news on Phys.org
phantomvommand said:
How do I solve this equation?
You are told k is very small, so you need to make an approximation.
And you know the extra is of order k2, so you know which terms to keep.
I would start by solving the quadratic.
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
haruspex said:
You are told k is very small, so you need to make an approximation.
And you know the extra is of order k2, so you know which terms to keep.
I would start by solving the quadratic.
Thank you! I was thinking that the quadratic equation formula couldn’t be applied to solve for thetadot because there is a sintheta*thetadot term. This doesn’t pose a problem I suppose?
 
phantomvommand said:
Thank you! I was thinking that the quadratic equation formula couldn’t be applied to solve for thetadot because there is a sintheta*thetadot term. This doesn’t pose a problem I suppose?
You can solve the quadratic for ##\dot\theta##, creating a trig term inside a square root. But then you can use the small k approximation to get rid of the square root. You may need to use it again. Just make sure to keep terms up to k2.
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
473
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K