Solving an equation which should give an animal's foraging radius

  • Thread starter Thread starter killbot2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving an equation to determine the foraging radius of an animal based on given energy and velocity parameters. Participants explore the correct formulation of the equation and the implications of potential typos in the source material.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an equation for calculating the radius, r = eV/12(Ema + 0.5Emc) + 2kV, but expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their solution.
  • Another participant suggests an alternative approach, proposing that distance could be calculated as energy divided by energy per meter, leading to a different value.
  • Concerns are raised about the original formula's presentation in an academic journal, with one participant suggesting a possible typo in the equation.
  • A later reply indicates that the formula might need to be adjusted for dimensional consistency, proposing a different arrangement of the terms.
  • One participant shares a different example where they believe they correctly calculated the radius, using a modified formula and different parameters.
  • Another participant attempts to clarify their approach, showing their calculations and arriving at a different numerical result.
  • Finally, one participant claims to have solved the problem, attributing the confusion to a typo regarding one of the energy values in the original problem statement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct formulation of the equation or the validity of the original values. Multiple competing views and interpretations of the equation remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the original equation's structure and the accuracy of the values provided in the journal. There are unresolved questions about dimensional consistency and the implications of potential typos.

killbot2000
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I have the following problem which should show me the distance an animal can travel

Homework Statement



e = 7.8*10^6 Joules
V= 12m/s
k= 2.0 Joules/m
Ema = 24 Watts
Emc = 42 Watts

The answer should be 116km

Homework Equations



r = eV/12(Ema + 0.5Emc) + 2kV

The Attempt at a Solution




I'm coming out with 159183.6735 which is certainly wrong.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, I think simply distance = energy / (energy/m) then you will get 3.9 10^6 m. The key is wrong I think...
 
This is given in an academic journal so I'm not sure where I've gone wrong, I've taken the values as they are presented.
 
killbot2000 said:
Hi all, I have the following problem which should show me the distance an animal can travel

Homework Statement



e = 7.8*10^6 Joules
V= 12m/s
k= 2.0 Joules/m
Ema = 24 Watts
Emc = 42 Watts

The answer should be 116km

Homework Equations



r = eV/12(Ema + 0.5Emc) + 2kV

The Attempt at a Solution

I'm coming out with 159183.6735 which is certainly wrong.

Thanks

Firstly you have certainly written the formula wrong and it is most likely

r = eV/[12(Ema + 0.5Emc) + 2kV]

(which tells you something about how to do the arithmetic operations).

This makes sense in terms of dimensions which without the square brackets it doesn't. (There are other possibilities so use the formula in the journal, not mine if different!)
 
Hi, the way I've written is the way it's given in the journal. Perhaps a typo on their part?
 
killbot2000 said:
Hi, the way I've written is the way it's given in the journal. Perhaps a typo on their part?

It does happen. Perhaps you could reproduce it directly from the journal here? Or link if this is free journal access.

But anyway your kV is (joules/m).(m/s) = joules/s = watts , the same unit as the other things I have grouped it with. It can't stand there on its own being equated to something expressed in meters on the other side of the equation.
 
Unfortunately I can't link directly because it's a hard copy. Perhaps I can give you another example where I seem to have worked out the answer correctly.

r = [e - T(Ema+Emc/2)]/2k

e = 7.8*10^6 Joules
k= 2.0 Joules/m
Ema = 24 Watts
Emc = 42 Watts
T = 48 hours

[ 7.8*10^6 - 172800 (24 + 42/2)]/4

The answer should be 6km and I got from the above
= 6000 m
 
The answers seem to be available.
What did my proposed version give?
Other possible likely version it could just have been

r = eV/12[(Ema + 0.5Emc) + 2kV]
 
r = eV/12(Ema + 0.5Emc) + 2kV

Hi,

My approach was as follows 7.8 x 10^6 x 12/[12(24+42) + 2 x 2 x 12]

That gives 111428.571429
 
  • #10
Hi all,

I think I solved the problem for those interested. It seems to have been a typo on the part of the author. Of the original values Ema should read 42 not 24.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
10K