Solving an Inertial Mystery: Angular Acceleration and Mud

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of mud being flung from a spinning wheel, particularly at an angle of ##\theta = \frac{\pi}{2}##. Participants agree that the acceleration of mud is always directed inward, meaning it cannot be thrown rearward relative to the ground. Instead, mud can be propelled forward or splashed upward, depending on the wheel's speed and the conditions of the road. The conversation highlights the complexities of mud dynamics, particularly when considering variables like wheel slip and pedestrian speed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular velocity and its effects on motion
  • Knowledge of inertia and acceleration vectors
  • Familiarity with the concept of rolling without slipping
  • Basic principles of projectile motion and fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of angular velocity on projectile motion
  • Study the principles of rolling friction and slip conditions
  • Explore fluid dynamics related to splashing and ejection of materials
  • Learn about the impact of speed on the behavior of debris from moving vehicles
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, automotive engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of moving vehicles and their interactions with the environment.

PhysicsRock
Messages
121
Reaction score
19
Homework Statement
A wheel of radius ##R## is spinning at angular velocity ##\omega##. What distance does a pedestrian walking behind the vehicle have to walk, to not be hit by a piece of mud falling off the wheel.
Relevant Equations
None really, it's all about the thought.
So, my idea would be that this happens at an angle ##\theta = \frac{\pi}{2}##, or quarter of a whole rotation. At this point, the wheel starts moving right again, after going to the left. Due to it's inertia, the piece of mud would want to keep it's current direction of motion and therefore fall off. The problem I'm facing now is that the acceleration always points to the center of the wheel, thus the mud would be accelerated towards the cars movement direction, rather than being thrown backward where it could hit the person.
Is my idea of the angle wrong or did I calculate the acceleration vector incorrectly? Help is very apprechiated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsRock said:
Homework Statement:: A wheel of radius ##R## is spinning at angular velocity ##\omega##. What distance does a pedestrian walking behind the vehicle have to walk, to not be hit by a piece of mud falling off the wheel.
Relevant Equations:: None really, it's all about the thought.

So, my idea would be that this happens at an angle ##\theta = \frac{\pi}{2}##, or quarter of a whole rotation. At this point, the wheel starts moving right again, after going to the left. Due to it's inertia, the piece of mud would want to keep it's current direction of motion and therefore fall off. The problem I'm facing now is that the acceleration always points to the center of the wheel, thus the mud would be accelerated towards the cars movement direction, rather than being thrown backward where it could hit the person.
Is my idea of the angle wrong or did I calculate the acceleration vector incorrectly? Help is very apprechiated.
I would suggest that mud or rain flies off of a spinning wheel at every possible rotation angle. It takes a variable length of time for a drop of mud to form and then drop free from the tire. Certainly, the seat of my pants has stood in mute testament to the fact that it sometimes takes more than a quarter of a rotation for the rear wheel in my bicycle to fling road grime up and forward.

Your observation that the acceleration of the mud is always inward is a good one. The rotating wheel cannot ever fling any material rearward. No portion of the rotating wheel is ever moving rearward relative to the ground.

The pedestrian can be hit by splashing mud. Or by mud flung forward by a rotating wheel.
 
jbriggs444 said:
I would suggest that mud or rain flies off of a spinning wheel at every possible rotation angle. It takes a variable length of time for a drop of mud to form and then drop free from the tire. Certainly, the seat of my pants has stood in mute testament to the fact that it sometimes takes more than a quarter of a rotation for the rear wheel in my bicycle to fling road grime up and forward.

Your observation that the acceleration of the mud is always inward is a good one. The rotating wheel cannot ever fling any material rearward. No portion of the rotating wheel is ever moving rearward relative to the ground.

The pedestrian can be hit by splashing mud. Or by mud flung forward by a rotating wheel.
Thank you so much! The last paragraph just gave me the idea I needed. Your answer was super helpful. :)
 
jbriggs444 said:
The rotating wheel cannot ever fling any material rearward. No portion of the rotating wheel is ever moving rearward relative to the ground.
I think "ever" is too absolute. Mud is notoriously slippery. If the wheel slips as it translates forward so that ##V<\omega R##, there is a good chance that mud can be flung rearward from ground level.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
kuruman said:
I think "ever" is too absolute. Mud is notoriously slippery. If the wheel slips as it translates forward so that ##V<\omega R##, there is a good chance that mud can be flung rearward from ground level.
Yeah, a slipping wheel can do the trick. I was assuming rolling without slipping.
 
Another complication is that the pedestrian is walking. How fast? Mud thrown in the first quadrant of rise will have less forward speed than the bicycle, so could hit a pedestrian moving almost as fast as the rider.
 
When I was in college, I bought a cheap bike that didn't have a mudguard (fender?) over the rear wheel. The first time I rode it in wet weather, I ended up with a one-inch wide streak of filthy water running down the middle of the back of my shirt. That's when I consciously realized that the water that was flung from the top of the wheel traveled, relative to the ground, at about twice the speed of the back of my shirt.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob012345 and jbriggs444
Back when my daily driver was a car that I had bought for $100.00, some friends challenged my statement that driving skill was more important than four wheel drive when driving off road. I agreed to show them, provided that they wash the car afterward. The left front fender was missing.

I observed that the amount of mud flying off the front tire varied with speed. At low speed, the mud stuck to the tire. At "high" speed, it came off right away and very little was flung up into the air. At a certain speed, a large amount was flung up into the air, where it came down and covered the car. I think that speed was near either 15 or 25 MPH.

They had to spend some money and time at the car wash, but they did not complain.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K