Solving arcsin(√2) with Hyperbolic Sin Function

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
50 replies · 21K views
srfriggen
Messages
304
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



What is arcsin(√2)?



The Attempt at a Solution




sin-1(√2)=a+bi

sin(a+bi)=√2

...expressing as hyperbolic sin function:

-i*sinh(-b+ai)=√2

sinh(-b+ai)=-(√2)/i

...using the definition of the sin hyperbolic function:

(e-b+ai-eb-ai)/2 = -(√2)/i

2e-b+ai-2eb-ai = -2√2*(1/i)

...converting using Euler's Formula:

2e-b[cos(a)+isin(a)] - 2eb[cos(-a)+i*sin(-a)] = -2√2*(1/i)

...using the fact that cos(a) and sin(a) are even and odd functions, respectively:

2e-b[cos(a)+isin(a)] - 2eb[cos(a)- i*sin(a)] = -2√2*(1/i)

...distributing, then rearranging terms into their Real and Imaginary parts:

(2e-b-2eb)cos(a) + (2e-b+2eb)sin(a)*i= -2√2*(1/i)


...Splitting this into two separate formulas, with the Reals part on the left equal to the Real part on the right, and the Imaginary part on the left equal to the imaginary part on the right:

{1} (2e-b-2eb)cos(a) = 2√2 ,

{2} (2e-b+2eb)sin(a) = -1

Now I need to solve for a and b...


Questions: for one, I am not sure if what I have is correct. I think it is, but perhaps I made a mistake.

If this is correct, I'm having a difficult time finding a and b. All previous example we did in class or the book had one equation equal to zero so it was clear where to start. A solution to {2} could be b=0, a=3pi/2, but that doesn't fit {1}. So am a bit stuck.


Thank you in advance for making it this far. I know there is a lot of algebra to this problem and I thank you for taking the time to consider this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
srfriggen said:

Homework Statement



What is arcsin(√2)?



The Attempt at a Solution




sin-1(√2)=a+bi

sin(a+bi)=√2

...expressing as hyperbolic sin function:

-i*sinh(-b+ai)=√2

sinh(-b+ai)=-(√2)/i

...using the definition of the sin hyperbolic function:

(e-b+ai-eb-ai)/2 = -(√2)/i

2e-b+ai-2eb-ai = -2√2*(1/i)

...converting using Euler's Formula:

2e-b[cos(a)+isin(a)] - 2eb[cos(-a)+i*sin(-a)] = -2√2*(1/i)

...using the fact that cos(a) and sin(a) are even and odd functions, respectively:

2e-b[cos(a)+isin(a)] - 2eb[cos(a)- i*sin(a)] = -2√2*(1/i)

...distributing, then rearranging terms into their Real and Imaginary parts:

(2e-b-2eb)cos(a) + (2e-b+2eb)sin(a)*i= -2√2*(1/i)


...Splitting this into two separate formulas, with the Reals part on the left equal to the Real part on the right, and the Imaginary part on the left equal to the imaginary part on the right:

{1} (2e-b-2eb)cos(a) = 2√2 ,

{2} (2e-b+2eb)sin(a) = -1
I didn't check the rest of your work, which seems a bit convoluted, but the righthand side you have does not equal ##2\sqrt{2}-i##. It's pure imaginary.

Now I need to solve for a and b...


Questions: for one, I am not sure if what I have is correct. I think it is, but perhaps I made a mistake.

If this is correct, I'm having a difficult time finding a and b. All previous example we did in class or the book had one equation equal to zero so it was clear where to start. A solution to {2} could be b=0, a=3pi/2, but that doesn't fit {1}. So am a bit stuck.


Thank you in advance for making it this far. I know there is a lot of algebra to this problem and I thank you for taking the time to consider this problem.
 
I apologize if it seems convoluted. I am following the steps my professor used when doing a similar problem.

I copied down my notes incorrectly... the right hand side should be: -2√2*(1/i).

We are just learning about complex numbers now, so I wasn't sure what 1/i was equal to, but did some algebra and I think it equals -1.

So now the right hand side should look like: 2√2+0*i.

How does that look to you?
 
Closer but no cigar. Remember ##i^2 = -1##, so ##i^4 = (i^2)^2 = (-1)^2 = 1##. That means ##1/i = i^4/i = i^3 = (i^2)i = -i##. (Factors of ##i## are a pain. They're mistakes waiting to happen.)

Now that I've taken a closer look, I see the algebra's not that bad. It's just a little strange that you didn't start off with
$$\sin x = \frac{e^{ix} - e^{-ix}}{2i},$$ which you can derive from Euler's formula if you haven't seen it before.
 
I see... so a+bi can be written as: 0+(2√2)i

So it looks now like the equations I need to solve, for a and b, are:

{1} (2e-b-2eb)cos(a) = 0 ,

{2} (2e-b+2eb)sin(a) = 2√2


Factoring out 2's yields:

{1'} (e-b-2eb)cos(a) = 0 ,

{2'} (e-b+2eb)sin(a) = √2


I notice from {1'} is true when b=0.

Substituting b=0 into {2'} I get:

2sin(a)=√2

sin(a)=√2/2

a=pi/4


So a=pi/4 and b=0 is one solution.

It also looks like b=0 and 3pi/4 is a solution, so in general:

b=0, a=k2pi(pi/4), and b=0, a=k2pi(3pi/4) are the solutions.
 
Well, apparently something went wrong. It's always a good idea to check if your answer makes sense. If ##a=\pi/4## and ##b=0##, you have ##z = a+bi = \pi/4##, and your solution therefore says that ##\sin z = \sin \pi/4 = \sqrt{2}##. Clearly, that's not right.
 
are my equations for {1} and {2} at least correct? Or did I miss something else?
 
I took those 2's out and made new equations {1'} and {2'}
 
srfriggen said:
I see... so a+bi can be written as: 0+(2√2)i

So it looks now like the equations I need to solve, for a and b, are:

{1} (2e-b-2eb)cos(a) = 0 ,

{2} (2e-b+2eb)sin(a) = 2√2


Factoring out 2's yields:

{1'} (e-b-2eb)cos(a) = 0 ,

{2'} (e-b+2eb)sin(a) = √2

Something's gone wrong here. You haven't divided by 2 correctly! But, you've also got the factors wrong. If b = 0 you should have sin(a) = √2. But you have 2sin(a) = √2.
 
shoot, I typed it in incorrectly from my notebook. I see the extra 2.


So when b=0: (1+1)sin(a)=√2, or sin(a)=√2/2. Is this correct?
 
srfriggen said:
shoot, I typed it in incorrectly from my notebook. I see the extra 2.


So when b=0: (1+1)sin(a)=√2, or sin(a)=√2/2. Is this correct?

No, you are out by a factor of 2. If b = 0, the equation should reduce to sin(a) = √2.
 
Ok, I re-worked the entire problem (using vela's advice to start with the definition for sin(x) and it made things simpler.

Now I end up with the last two formulas:

[1] (e-b-eb)cos(a)=0, and

[2] (e-b+eb)sin(a)=2√2

Working with [1] first I can set a=pi/2 to obtain a solution.

Substituting pi/2 into [2] I get:

e-b+eb=2√2.


Thoughts?
 
so one way to answer would be: b=cosh-1(√2).
 
Last edited:
haruspex said:
Still wrong.
sin(z) = (eiz+e-iz)/(2i) = √2
Writing w = eiz, (w + 1/w)/(2i) = √2

sin(z) = (eiz-e-iz)/(2i) = √2
Writing w = eiz, (w - 1/w)/(2i) = √2

But, in any case, it reduces to the same equation for eb where z = a + ib and a = ∏/2.
 
So does this mean the work I've done is incorrect, or did I make it to the end without mistakes?
 
May I ask why you're not just using the formula for arcsin:

$$\arcsin(z)=-i\log[iz+(1-z^2)^{1/2}]$$

I mean your thread title was to compute ##\arcsin(\sqrt{2})## and not to derive the formula so that's why I'm asking. And you do know it's infinitely-valued right? That's because for one, the square-root in the formula is two values and the log term is of course infinitely valued so it's actually doubly-infinitely-valued.
 
PeroK said:
sin(z) = (eiz-e-iz)/(2i) = √2
Writing w = eiz, (w - 1/w)/(2i) = √2

But, in any case, it reduces to the same equation for eb where z = a + ib and a = ∏/2.

Does that mean the work I've done to this point is correct? Or is there a mistake in it?

I still just need to solve the equation x+1/x=2rad2?
 
vela said:
You can solve it in terms of inverse cosh. If that's not satisfactory, try using ##x=e^b## so that ##1/x = e^{-b}## and you get
$$x + \frac{1}{x} = 2\sqrt{2}.$$ It's straightforward to solve for ##x##.

so solving for x I get x=2√2±1.

Which means eb=2√2±1

so b=ln(2√2±1).If this is correct please let me know. I know I need to go back and check other multiples of "a", such as pi*a.
 
srfriggen said:
so solving for x I get x=2√2±1.

Which means eb=2√2±1

so b=ln(2√2±1).


If this is correct please let me know. I know I need to go back and check other multiples of "a", such as pi*a.
The answer cannot be real. You're still losing a factor i. See my corrected post #20:
w2 - 1/w = 2i√2
This will give you the same real part, but add an imaginary part.
 
haruspex said:
The answer cannot be real. You're still losing a factor i. See my corrected post #20:
w2 - 1/w = 2i√2
This will give you the same real part, but add an imaginary part.

"a" will be the real part. "b" will have an "i" tacked onto it. I left it out while doing the calculations but that's just how my professor did it in class.
 
Last edited:
vela said:
You messed up somewhere. You should get ##x=\sqrt{2}\pm 1##.

yes you're definitely correct. I see my mistake and just fixed it.

so b=ln[itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex]±1*i?
 
vela said:
Right.

oh thank god!

thank you for your patience!