Minima of sin function with domain (a, b)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the function f(x) = sin(x) within the interval x ∈ (π/4, 7π/4). Participants are exploring the number and locations of local minima for this function in the specified domain.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants note the identification of one minimum at 3π/2 but express uncertainty regarding the minima due to the open interval. Others discuss the implications of considering endpoints in the context of local maxima and minima.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning the definitions of local extrema in relation to the open interval. There is recognition of differing interpretations regarding the inclusion of endpoints in local extrema definitions, and some guidance on terminology relevant to the course has been provided.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted distinction between open and closed intervals in relation to local minima and maxima, with some participants emphasizing that the endpoints do not contribute to local extrema in this case.

ndesk1900
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the function f(x) = sin (x) in the interval x ∈ (p/4, 7p/4). The number and location(s) of the local minima of this function are?

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I have managed to get one of the minimas (i.e. 3p/2), however i am unsure about the the minima. If x ∈ [p/4, 7p/4], then it would be p/4 however since x ∈ (p/4, 7p/4) and p/4 is not part of the domain not sure what the minima would be. Here is an image to denote the same idea.

*Please note p is pie here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ndesk1900 said:

Homework Statement


Consider the function f(x) = sin (x) in the interval x ∈ (p/4, 7p/4). The number and location(s) of the local minima of this function are?

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I have managed to get one of the minimas (i.e. 3p/2), however i am unsure about the the minima. If x ∈ [p/4, 7p/4], then it would be p/4 however since x ∈ (p/4, 7p/4) and p/4 is not part of the domain not sure what the minima would be. Here is an image to denote the same idea.

*Please note p is pie here.

This character - π - is pi, not pie.

For the function on its restricted domain, there is one maximum (plural is maxima) and one minimum (plural is minima). The usual techniques of calculus can be used to find these critical points.
 
But it is sufficient to know that sin(x) is always between -1 and 1 and is equal to -1 if and only if x= (4n+3)\pi/2where where n is any integer.
 
Mark44 said:
This character - π - is pi, not pie.

For the function on its restricted domain, there is one maximum (plural is maxima) and one minimum (plural is minima). The usual techniques of calculus can be used to find these critical points.

However, the question asked for *local* maxima/minama, so the endpoints could count as well (at least in standard optimization terminology, where a local min in an interval means that we do not look outside the interval, so can have a positive derivative if the local min is a left endpoint or a negative derivative at a right-hand end point). However, not all treatments agree with that terminology; it is more commonly used in optimization textbooks than in calculus textbooks, for example (because in the 'real world' we very often encounter such solutions to problems, and we need a way to talk about them in a common language). The OP will need to use terminology relevant to the course.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
However, the question asked for *local* maxima/minama, so the endpoints could count as well
Understood.
However, the OP provided a graph from which it was obvious to the most casual observer that endpoints of the restricted domain were not going to contribute maxima or minima. For that reason, I didn't say anything about checking the endpoints, something that I normally do.
Ray Vickson said:
(at least in standard optimization terminology, where a local min in an interval means that we do not look outside the interval, so can have a positive derivative if the local min is a left endpoint or a negative derivative at a right-hand end point). However, not all treatments agree with that terminology; it is more commonly used in optimization textbooks than in calculus textbooks, for example (because in the 'real world' we very often encounter such solutions to problems, and we need a way to talk about them in a common language). The OP will need to use terminology relevant to the course.

RGV
 
Mark44 said:
Understood.
However, the OP provided a graph from which it was obvious to the most casual observer that endpoints of the restricted domain were not going to contribute maxima or minima. For that reason, I didn't say anything about checking the endpoints, something that I normally do.

The only reason they are not local min/max is that in this case the domain is an open interval instead of a closed one (and I assume the OP *really* meant what he wrote). Had the interval been closed, the endpoints would be local optima (but, assuredly, not global optima), inasmuch as they would respect the definition that x_0 \in [a,b] is a local minimizer (maximizer) of f(x) on [a,b] if f(x_0) \leq f(x) \;(\geq f(x)) \: \forall x \in [a,b] \text{ in a neighbourhood of } x_0.

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K