1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Eqn for SHM, sin function, so why cos?

  1. Dec 20, 2011 #1
    I had thought the eqn of simple harmonic motion is a sinusoidal function of time, with the eqn being:

    x(t) = A sin(wt + ∅0)

    Halfway down this page:
    http://electron9.phys.utk.edu/phys135d/modules/m9/oscillations.htm [Broken]
    in Problems:

    in solution (a) it gives;

    The displacement as a function of time is x(t) = Acos(ωt + φ).

    Why are they using a cos and not a sin function?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 20, 2011 #2

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Which one you use is arbitrary. Realize that the only difference between the two is a phase factor. (Shift a sine function by 90° and it becomes a cosine function.)

    Using x = Acosωt just implies that you are starting the clock when the object is at its maximum displacement. Using x = Asinωt implies that you are starting the clock when the object passes the equilibrium point.

    Just two completely equivalent ways of describing the same thing.
     
  4. Dec 20, 2011 #3
    Thank you Doc Al :smile:
     
  5. Dec 20, 2011 #4
    Doc Al has said it..... you will not hear a more straightforward explanation
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Eqn for SHM, sin function, so why cos?
  1. Sin/Cos In Equation (Replies: 3)

  2. What is cos and sin? (Replies: 7)

Loading...