Solving Bra-Ket Equations: Hermitian Operators & Real Numbers

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of bra-ket notation in the context of Hermitian operators and real numbers within a vector space. Participants are exploring the relationships between bras and kets, particularly in relation to the operators Sx, Sy, and Sz.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the implications of having real numbers in a Hilbert space and how this affects the relationship between bras and kets. There is an exploration of whether the equality Sy|a> =

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the properties of linear maps and the structure of the dual space. Some participants are suggesting that while Sy|a> and cannot be equal as elements of different spaces, they may share similar components in a specific basis.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing examination of the definitions and assumptions regarding real numbers in the context of quantum mechanics and linear algebra, particularly in relation to the properties of Hermitian operators and their action on state vectors.

rubertoda
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
bra - ket??

Hi, maybe a stupid question, but i would like to know if, if We have a real number, but we are i a vector space, and the operator is hermitian, is |a> is equal to < a |*?


i assume this, because if a is the vector (1,0) (spin up), and only real entries.

im trying to make ((Sy|a>) |b>) to ((<a|Sy)|b>) somehow..if both a and b are real..please solve this mess

I am talking about Sx, Sy, Sz is hermitian operators.. and these are operating..
are these 3 hermitian conjugates to each other?
i might add, that Sy can ONLY operate on the 'a' state ( <a| or |a>)

and, finally, how would you write out <a|Sy?, is it a vector?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Can you give a little more information about what you mean when you talk about real numbers? Bras and kets are members of a Hilbert space, so the concept of "real number" doesn't mean anything when talking about them.
 


Do you mean that,

Sy|a> = a |a> where a is real?

<a| Sy = row vector times matrix = row vector
 


yes, i mean row vector times matrix, i would like to show that Sy|a> = <a|Sy, if Sy is hermitian..
 


rubertoda said:
yes, i mean row vector times matrix, i would like to show that Sy|a> = <a|Sy, if Sy is hermitian..
If |a> is a member of a Hilbert space H, then so is Sy|a>. But <a| is a member of the dual space H*, defined as the set of continuous linear functions from H into ℂ. <a|Sy is another member of H*, so it can't be equal to any member of H, like e.g. Sy|a>.

It would however make sense to ask if they have the same components, with respect to some basis {|i>} and its dual basis {<i|} (the latter being defined by <i|j>=δij). The ith component of <a|Sy is by definition <a|Sy|i>. (See this post for more about components of linear maps with respect to a basis). The ith component of Sy|a> is just its projection onto the ith basis vector, <i|Sy|a>.
 


another way to think of it,

Sy|a> = <a|Sy

Sy|a> = matrix times column vector = column vector


<a|Sy = row vector times matrix = row vector

it is not possible that Sy|a> = <a|Sy
 


Jesssa said:
Sy|a> = matrix times column vector = column vector


<a|Sy = row vector times matrix = row vector

it is not possible that Sy|a> = <a|Sy
This argument is fine when the vector space is finite.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K