Solving Complex Integrals: Can I Treat i as Any Other Constant?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving integrals involving complex exponentials, specifically the integral of the form ∫ f(v) e^(iavx) dv. Participants are exploring whether the imaginary unit i can be treated as a constant in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest expanding the complex exponent using Euler's formula and integrating the resulting cosine and sine components. There is uncertainty about treating i as a constant and whether this approach is valid.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confidence in treating i as a constant, while others explore the implications of using Euler's formula. There is a mix of agreement and differing opinions on the correctness of the approaches discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of integrating functions with complex exponentials and are considering the implications of their assumptions about constants in this context.

Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
How do I solve an integral of the type

[tex]\int f(v) e^{iavx} dv[/tex] ?

Can I just treat i as any other constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not entirely sure I am correct about this but it seems logical to expand the complex exponent and integrate it further from there.
[tex]e^{i \phi} = \cos (\phi) + i \sin (\phi)[/tex]

At a guess I would say yes, [tex]i[/tex] is a constant... Just a logical guess though...
 
[tex]\int f(v) e^{iavx} dv = \int f(v) \left( \cos{avx} + i \sin{avx} \right) dv =[/tex]
[tex]= \int f(v) \cos{avx} dv + i \int f(v) \sin{avx} dv[/tex]

Maybe?
 
Yes, you can treat [itex]i[/itex] as a constant.

Or you can use Euler's formula and write it as the sum of cos and sin, yes.
 
Using Euler's formula doesn't get rid of the [tex]i[/tex] ofcourse...

Logarythmic, looks fine by me as long as you put [tex]avx[/tex] in brackets ;)
 
Got it, so
[tex]w(x) = \int_{-u_0}^{u_0} i2 \pi v e^{i2 \pi vx} dv = \frac{1}{\pi x^2} \left[ 2 \pi u_0 x \cos{(2 \pi u_0 x)} - \sin{(2 \pi u_0 x)} \right][/tex]
 
I got the same, so I guess it's correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
951
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K