MHB Solving Congruences with Polynomials: A Prime Challenge

Fantini
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
267
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble with the following question:

Construct a polynomial $q(x) \neq 0$ with integer coefficients which has no rational roots but is such that for any prime $p$ we can solve the congruence $q(x) \equiv 0 \mod p$ in the integers.

Any hints on how to even start the problem will be strongly appreciated. (Nod) Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fantini said:
I'm having trouble with the following question:

Construct a polynomial $q(x) \neq 0$ with integer coefficients which has no rational roots but is such that for any prime $p$ we can solve the congruence $q(x) \equiv 0 \mod p$ in the integers.

Any hints on how to even start the problem will be strongly appreciated. (Nod) Thanks.

Hi Fantini, :)

Let me give you a hint. Consider the Fermat's little theorem and see whether you can think of a polynomial satisfying the given conditions.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Thank you Sudharaka, but now I have found the solution. :) I will post it later.

Cheers.
 
Fantini said:
Thank you Sudharaka, but now I have found the solution. :) I will post it later.

Cheers.

You are welcome. :) I was thinking about the polynomial \(q(x)=x^p-x\) so that the congruence \(q(x)\equiv 0(\mbox{mod } p)\) could be solved in the integers (by the Fermat's little theorem), but alas \(q\) has rational roots (examples are \(x=0,1\)). So to make it rational root less, we can do a little improvement. Take,

\[q(x)=x^p-x+p\]

By the Rational root theorem the list of possible rational roots that this polynomial could have are \(\pm 1,\pm p\). Clearly, \(x= \pm 1, p\) do not satisfy the equation \(q(x)=0\). Let \(x=-p\) be a root of \(q(x)\). Then,

\[q(-p)=0\Rightarrow (-p)^p+2p=0\]

If \(p\) is even, \(p=2\) and we have \(p^p+2p=8=0\) which is contradictory. If \(p\) is odd,

\[\Rightarrow -p^p+2p=0\Rightarrow p^{p-1}=2\]

Since \(p\) is an odd prime, \(p\geq 3\). Hence the equation \(p^{p-1}=2\) cannot be satisfied. Therefore we see that there are no rational roots for,

\[q(x)=x^p-x+p\]

Interested to see your solution. :)
 
A quick internet search comes up with the polynomial $p(x) = (x^2-2)(x^2-3)(x^2-6)$ (see here, for example).

The reason that works is that if 2 and 3 are both quadratic non-residues mod $p$ then their product 6 will be a quadratic residue. On the other hand, $p(x)$ clearly has no rational roots.
 
The solution is similar to what Opalg's search found. We considered the polynomial $q(x) = (x^2 +1)(x^2 +2)(x^2 -2)$ and, using elementary number theory arguments such as Legendre's symbol and quadratic residues, proved it satisfied the conditions of the statement. :D

Thanks for the search link, Opalg!
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K