Solving Congruences with Polynomials: A Prime Challenge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around constructing a polynomial \(q(x) \neq 0\) with integer coefficients that has no rational roots while allowing for the solution of the congruence \(q(x) \equiv 0 \mod p\) for any prime \(p\). The proposed solution is \(q(x) = x^p - x + p\), which avoids rational roots by ensuring that potential rational roots do not satisfy the equation. Additionally, the polynomial \(p(x) = (x^2-2)(x^2-3)(x^2-6)\) is mentioned as another valid example, leveraging properties of quadratic residues and non-residues in modular arithmetic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with Fermat's Little Theorem
  • Knowledge of the Rational Root Theorem
  • Basic concepts of quadratic residues and non-residues
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Fermat's Little Theorem in polynomial congruences
  • Explore the Rational Root Theorem in depth
  • Investigate quadratic residues and non-residues in number theory
  • Learn about Legendre's symbol and its applications in polynomial equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in polynomial equations, modular arithmetic, and their applications in solving congruences.

Fantini
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
267
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble with the following question:

Construct a polynomial $q(x) \neq 0$ with integer coefficients which has no rational roots but is such that for any prime $p$ we can solve the congruence $q(x) \equiv 0 \mod p$ in the integers.

Any hints on how to even start the problem will be strongly appreciated. (Nod) Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fantini said:
I'm having trouble with the following question:

Construct a polynomial $q(x) \neq 0$ with integer coefficients which has no rational roots but is such that for any prime $p$ we can solve the congruence $q(x) \equiv 0 \mod p$ in the integers.

Any hints on how to even start the problem will be strongly appreciated. (Nod) Thanks.

Hi Fantini, :)

Let me give you a hint. Consider the Fermat's little theorem and see whether you can think of a polynomial satisfying the given conditions.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Thank you Sudharaka, but now I have found the solution. :) I will post it later.

Cheers.
 
Fantini said:
Thank you Sudharaka, but now I have found the solution. :) I will post it later.

Cheers.

You are welcome. :) I was thinking about the polynomial \(q(x)=x^p-x\) so that the congruence \(q(x)\equiv 0(\mbox{mod } p)\) could be solved in the integers (by the Fermat's little theorem), but alas \(q\) has rational roots (examples are \(x=0,1\)). So to make it rational root less, we can do a little improvement. Take,

\[q(x)=x^p-x+p\]

By the Rational root theorem the list of possible rational roots that this polynomial could have are \(\pm 1,\pm p\). Clearly, \(x= \pm 1, p\) do not satisfy the equation \(q(x)=0\). Let \(x=-p\) be a root of \(q(x)\). Then,

\[q(-p)=0\Rightarrow (-p)^p+2p=0\]

If \(p\) is even, \(p=2\) and we have \(p^p+2p=8=0\) which is contradictory. If \(p\) is odd,

\[\Rightarrow -p^p+2p=0\Rightarrow p^{p-1}=2\]

Since \(p\) is an odd prime, \(p\geq 3\). Hence the equation \(p^{p-1}=2\) cannot be satisfied. Therefore we see that there are no rational roots for,

\[q(x)=x^p-x+p\]

Interested to see your solution. :)
 
A quick internet search comes up with the polynomial $p(x) = (x^2-2)(x^2-3)(x^2-6)$ (see here, for example).

The reason that works is that if 2 and 3 are both quadratic non-residues mod $p$ then their product 6 will be a quadratic residue. On the other hand, $p(x)$ clearly has no rational roots.
 
The solution is similar to what Opalg's search found. We considered the polynomial $q(x) = (x^2 +1)(x^2 +2)(x^2 -2)$ and, using elementary number theory arguments such as Legendre's symbol and quadratic residues, proved it satisfied the conditions of the statement. :D

Thanks for the search link, Opalg!
 

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K