MHB Solving Cubic Equations using Origami

  • Thread starter Thread starter greenglasses
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using origami to solve cubic equations, specifically the equation x^3 + ax^2 + bx + c = 0. It explains how to create a parabola using origami folds, with points P1 and P2 representing specific coordinates and lines L1 and L2 defining the framework for the folds. The confusion arises from the derivation of the equations (x1-a)^2 = 4y1 and (x1-a)(x-x1) = 2(y-y1), which relate to the properties of the parabola and the crease formed during the folding process. The thread also references resources on origami's applications in computational problems and its evolution as both an art and engineering tool. Understanding these concepts can clarify the mathematical principles behind solving cubic equations with origami.
greenglasses
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I have to write a research paper on a mathematical topic for my class; I chose the above topic.

I understand that a parabola can be formed using a focus and directrix, both created by origami folds, and that Axiom 6 of Origami-Folding (Given two points p1 and p2 and two lines l1 and l2, there is a fold that places p1 onto l1 and p2 onto l2) can be used to solve a cubic equation. But some of this explanation of why confuses me:

"Now, let's solve the cubic equation x^3+ax^2+bx+c=0 with origami. Let two points P1 and P2 have the coordinates (a,1) and (c,b), respectively. Also let two lines L1 and L2 have the equations y+1=0 and x+c=0, respectively. Fold a line placing P1 onto L1 and placing P2 onto L2, and the slope of the crease is the solution of x^3+ax^2+bx+c=0.

I will explain why. Let p1 be a parabola having the focus P1 and the directrix L1. Since the crease is not parallel to the y-axis, we can let the crease have the equation y=tx+u. Let the crease be tangent to p1 at (x1,y1), and (x1-a)^2=4y1. Because the crease has the equation (x1-a)(x-x1)=2(y-y1), we get t=(x1-a)/2 and u=y1-x1(x1-a)/2. From these equations, we get u=-t2-at."

Specifically, I do not understand where the equations (x1-a)^2=4y1 and (x1-a)(x-x1)=2(y-y1) are coming from and w hat they mean.

I would greatly appreciate someone helping to explain.

[this explanation comes from K's Origami : Origami Construction if you want a look at the entire thing]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I found a reference that describes how origami is used in a variety of computational problems. In particular, the classic trisecting an angle and doubling the cube from ancient Greece which are based on cubic equations.

https://plus.maths.org/content/power-origami

and to pique your origami interest further there is the PBS documentary Between the Folds that shows how far Origami has come as an art and as an engineering tool:



There are many other resources on Origami as books and videos from Robert Lang and Eric DeMaine



 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top