MHB Solving Cubic Root Algebra: Don't Know the Steps

STS
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I don't understand this.
a is not suppose to be -1; this is the only rule in the equation
The answer is the second picture, I just don't know the steps that lead to that answer.
View attachment 8926
 

Attachments

  • 9CF9CCB6-D594-44E5-8980-651A512FD6DD.jpeg
    9CF9CCB6-D594-44E5-8980-651A512FD6DD.jpeg
    9.5 KB · Views: 113
  • F124AFBD-F35E-4E44-81AF-3136409AF46D.jpeg
    F124AFBD-F35E-4E44-81AF-3136409AF46D.jpeg
    2.7 KB · Views: 104
Mathematics news on Phys.org
STS said:
I don't understand this.
a is not suppose to be -1; this is the only rule in the equation
The answer is the second picture, I just don't know the steps that lead to that answer.
In order for this to be correct we would need [math]\sqrt[3]{ 0.125 - 0.5 } = 0[/math], which clearly isn't true. Is there a typo?

-Dan
 
Hi STS.

You probably mean the following expression:
$$\frac{4a^2-10\times\sqrt[3]{0.064}}{3a+3+{\color{red}\sqrt[3]{0.125}}-0.5}.$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top