MHB Solving Cubic Root Algebra: Don't Know the Steps

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around confusion regarding the steps to solve a cubic root algebra problem. The main point of contention is the assertion that "a is not supposed to be -1," which is highlighted as a critical rule in the equation. Participants express uncertainty about the validity of the equation leading to the answer shown in a referenced image. One user suggests that a typo may exist, particularly questioning the expression involving the cubic root of 0.125. Overall, clarity on the steps and correctness of the equation is sought.
STS
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I don't understand this.
a is not suppose to be -1; this is the only rule in the equation
The answer is the second picture, I just don't know the steps that lead to that answer.
View attachment 8926
 

Attachments

  • 9CF9CCB6-D594-44E5-8980-651A512FD6DD.jpeg
    9CF9CCB6-D594-44E5-8980-651A512FD6DD.jpeg
    9.5 KB · Views: 115
  • F124AFBD-F35E-4E44-81AF-3136409AF46D.jpeg
    F124AFBD-F35E-4E44-81AF-3136409AF46D.jpeg
    2.7 KB · Views: 107
Mathematics news on Phys.org
STS said:
I don't understand this.
a is not suppose to be -1; this is the only rule in the equation
The answer is the second picture, I just don't know the steps that lead to that answer.
In order for this to be correct we would need [math]\sqrt[3]{ 0.125 - 0.5 } = 0[/math], which clearly isn't true. Is there a typo?

-Dan
 
Hi STS.

You probably mean the following expression:
$$\frac{4a^2-10\times\sqrt[3]{0.064}}{3a+3+{\color{red}\sqrt[3]{0.125}}-0.5}.$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top