Solving differential equation involving initial value?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the first-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by dy/dt = y - 5 with the initial condition y(0) = y0. The correct approach involves recognizing that the equation can be separated into the form (dy/(y - 5)) = dt, allowing for straightforward integration. The solution is derived as y = 5 + (y0 - 5)e^t, with the constant C determined as y0 - 5. The integrating factor method was initially considered but proved unnecessary for this separable equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of first-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Knowledge of separation of variables technique
  • Familiarity with integration and logarithmic functions
  • Ability to manipulate exponential functions and constants
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables in differential equations
  • Learn about integrating factors in solving linear ODEs
  • Explore initial value problems and their solutions
  • Investigate the properties of exponential functions in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying differential equations, as well as professionals in fields requiring mathematical modeling and analysis.

Chandasouk
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
dy/dt = y-5 , y(0) = y0

The general form for first ODE has to resemble this

dy/dt + p(t) = g(t)

so I moved the y over to the left side of the equation

dy/dt - y = -5

I think this is where I screw things up. It's not really in this form dy/dt + p(t) = g(t) but rather dy/dt - p(t) = g(t).

Regardless, I went to find an integrating factor \mu(t) = e\intp(t)dt

which gave me e-t as my \mu(t). You then have to multiply that to both sides of this equation

dy/dt - y = -5

Is my procedure correct so far? Because I cannot get the correct answer which is

y=5+(y0-5)et
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chandasouk said:
dy/dt = y-5 , y(0) = y0

The general form for first ODE has to resemble this

dy/dt + p(t) = g(t)

so I moved the y over to the left side of the equation

dy/dt - y = -5

I think this is where I screw things up. It's not really in this form dy/dt + p(t) = g(t) but rather dy/dt - p(t) = g(t).

Regardless, I went to find an integrating factor \mu(t) = e\intp(t)dt


which gave me e-t as my \mu(t). You then have to multiply that to both sides of this equation

dy/dt - y = -5

Is my procedure correct so far? Because I cannot get the correct answer which is

y=5+(y0-5)et

I'm not sure you wrote the problem correctly. You have dy/dt - y = -5 but y is not of the form p(t).

I get y=\frac{5t+y(0)}{1-t}
 
mathstew said:
I'm not sure you wrote the problem correctly. You have dy/dt - y = -5 but y is not of the form p(t).

I get y=\frac{5t+y(0)}{1-t}

Well, that's wrong. The solution is an exponential. You can probably get it with an integrating factor. But it's a lot easier if you just realize the equation is separable.
 
Last edited:
I actually am behind two lectures because I switched into a new math section, so could you show how to do it with integrating factor?
 
There's no need. Just take the initial and divide both sides by (y-5). Then you have something integrable.
 
To elaborate on what Char. Limit said, separate the original equation like this:
\frac{dy}{y - 5} = dt
Now integrate both sides.
 
I took the integral and got

ln(y-5) = t+c

taking e of both sides gives

(y-5) = et+C

I do y(0) = y0 =(y-5) = et+C

How do I get my C term?
 
Chandasouk said:
I took the integral and got

ln(y-5) = t+c

taking e of both sides gives

(y-5) = et+C

I do y(0) = y0 =(y-5) = et+C

How do I get my C term?

You can write e^(t+C) as C*e^t since C is an arbitrary constant. So put t=0 and y=y0 into y-5=C*e^t. What's C?
 
Thanks, Dick. I wasn't aware that you could rewrite it that way. I'll have to keep that in mind. C is then y0-5
 
  • #10
Chandasouk said:
Thanks, Dick. I wasn't aware that you could rewrite it that way. I'll have to keep that in mind. C is then y0-5

e^(x+C)=e^C*e^x. Since C is arbitrary you may as well just call e^C the arbitrary constant and write it C*e^x.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K