Solving Eigenvalue Problems: Choosing Eigenvectors

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WannabeNewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalue
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the nuances of selecting eigenvectors after determining eigenvalues for a given operator. The example provided involves the matrix \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 1\\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} and highlights the relationship between components of eigenvectors, specifically addressing the ambiguity in choosing signs for components like v_{1} and v_{3}. It is established that any scalar multiple of an eigenvector, including sign changes, represents a valid eigenvector corresponding to the same eigenvalue. The discussion concludes with the understanding that scalar multiplication does not affect the validity of the eigenvector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Familiarity with matrix operations
  • Knowledge of linear algebra concepts
  • Experience with diagonalization of matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of eigenvectors and eigenvalues in linear algebra
  • Learn about matrix diagonalization techniques
  • Explore the implications of scalar multiplication on eigenvectors
  • Investigate applications of eigenvalues in various mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as researchers dealing with eigenvalue problems in applied mathematics and physics.

WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,850
Reaction score
553
I have a rather basic question about solving eigenvalue problems. Once you actually find all the eigenvalues for a given operator in some basis and you go about finding the respective eigenvectors through the components and run into a situation like this:
[tex]\mid \omega = 1 >[/tex] [tex]\Rightarrow \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1 & 0 & 1\\ <br /> 0 & 1 & 0 \\ <br /> 1 & 0 & 1<br /> \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}<br /> v_{1}\\ <br /> v_{2}\\ <br /> v_{3}<br /> \end{bmatrix} = 0[/tex]

and you put it into the form
[tex]v_{1} + v_{3} = 0[/tex]
[tex]v_{2} = 0[/tex]
[tex]v_{1} + v_{3} = 0[/tex]

isn't there an ambiguity as to whether you choose to set [tex]v_{1} = -v_{3}[/tex] as opposed to [tex]v_{3} = -v_{1}[/tex] for the eigenvector(normalized or not) corresponding to the eigenvalue? Does it not make a difference regarding sign for the respective components of the eigenvector? Sorry if this is a petty question I just wasn't sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there is an eigenvector then any scalar multiple of it is also an eigenvector with the same eigenvalue. In your example, one eigenvector can be obtained from another by multiplication by -1.

If you imagine that you have the matrix in its diagonal form (or "almost diagonal" form), then it becomes obvious that scalar multiplication doesn't matter.
 
Oh of course. Thank you very much; at least now I know why I kept getting an answer -1 times what the key had. =D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K