Solving Exponents: Simplifying Radical Expressions

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CSmith1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponent
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying radical expressions and understanding when to present answers in square root form versus exponential form. Participants explore the nuances of expressing solutions, particularly in the context of mathematical problems involving exponents and roots.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a method for simplifying the expression 8^(3/2) and arrives at 16 square root 2.
  • Another participant acknowledges the correctness of the final answer but finds the initial work hard to follow.
  • A participant questions how to determine when to express answers in square root form versus exponential form, referencing a specific example of 32^(2/5) yielding 2^2.
  • Another participant asserts that the final answer to the example should simply be 4, arguing against the necessity of writing it as 2^2.
  • There is a discussion about the preference for keeping square roots in the final answer unless a decimal approximation is used, with an example of simplifying √20.
  • A later reply introduces the perspective that in practical applications, such as engineering, a decimal approximation may be more useful than an exact but complex answer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the presentation of answers, with some advocating for square root forms while others prefer exponential forms. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best practices for expressing simplified answers.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of context in determining the appropriate form for answers, indicating that preferences may vary based on the audience or application, such as academic versus practical scenarios.

CSmith1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
1.) 8 3/2

=(81/2)3
=(2 squareroot 8)2

(2 square root 2x2x2)3

=(2 square root )3
=2 square root x 2 square root x 2 square root=8 (2 square root)
=16 square root 2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
CSmith said:
1.) 8 3/2

=(81/2)3
=(2 squareroot 8)2

(2 square root 2x2x2)3

=(2 square root )3
=2 square root x 2 square root x 2 square root=8 (2 square root)
=16 square root 2

It's a little hard to follow your work but the final answer is correct! (Clapping)
 
Thanks!:) I am trying...
 
how do i know when the answer should be in square root form like 16 square root 2 or when it is suppose to be in powers like my answer for 32 2/5 when the answer was 2^2.
 
CSmith said:
how do i know when the answer should be in square root form like 16 square root 2 or when it is suppose to be in powers like my answer for 32 2/5 when the answer was 2^2.

The final answer to that problem is 4. There's no reason to write it as 2^2.

With square roots, you simplify as much as you can until you are left with a prime number, so you must keep the square root sign or use a decimal approximation, which is not preferred. If you have something like [math]\sqrt{20}[/math] then you can simplify it but there will be a square root in the final answer.
 
Last edited:
Jameson said:
The final answer to that problem is 4. There's no reason to write it as 2^2.

With square roots, you simplify as much as you can until you are left with a prime number, so you must keep the square root sign or use a decimal approximation, which is not preferred. If you have something like [math]\sqrt{20}[/math] then you can simplify it but there will be a square root in the final answer.

True so far as it goes. An engineering professor is not necessarily going to want a highly complicated but exact answer when an easy-to-understand decimal approximation helps the bridge get built more easily.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K