Solving F(r) and Finding Potential Function in r

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining if the force F(r) is conservative and finding a potential function associated with it. The force is given as F(r) = (1/||r||)(-xi + yj), where r = xi + yj. Participants are exploring the mathematical implications of this force in the context of vector calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to derive the potential function V from the force F and questions the use of integration and the manipulation of r. Other participants discuss the components of the force and the implications of showing that the field is conservative, suggesting the use of curl to verify conservativeness.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the assumptions involved in determining if the force is conservative. Some have offered partial insights into the calculations and methods, while others express uncertainty about the necessary conditions for the force field.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the potential assumptions being made regarding the conservativeness of the force field and the implications of using curl to verify this property. Participants are also considering the implications of their findings on the potential function.

ElDavidas
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
I'm going over an exam question and it reads as follows:

"Determine if the force F(r) is conservative (justify your answer) and, if it is, find a potential function in the case

[tex]F(r) = \frac {1} {||r||} (-xi + yj)[/tex]

where r = xi + yj"

I know that F = -grad V where V is the potential function. In order to find the potential function V from the above, do you integrate grad V for each unit vector i and j?

Another thing is, I'm not very sure how to manipulate the r. Would you use the quotient rule in order to find [tex]\frac {dV} {dydx}[/tex] as an example?

If somebody managed to answer the question and display their answer showing how they did it, that would be fantastic! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
||r|| is, of course [itex]\sqrt{x^2+ y^2}[/itex] or (x2+ y2)1/2.

F(x,y)= -x(x2+ y2)-1/2i+ y(x2+ y2)-1/2j

If we write that as f(x,y)i+ g(x,y)j then [itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}= (-x)(-\frac{1}{2})(x^2+ y^2)^{-\frac{3}{2}}(2y)= xy(x^2+y^2)^{\frac{-3}{2}}[/itex].
 
HallsofIvy said:
[itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}= (-x)(-\frac{1}{2})(x^2+ y^2)^{-\frac{3}{2}}(2y)= xy(x^2+y^2)^{\frac{-3}{2}}[/itex].

So is this the potential function of V?
 
This looks like a fairly well fudged problem. :biggrin:

If the field is conservative then it is the gradient of a scalar function. If you were to 'show' that it is conservative by finding such a scalar function then aren't you assuming that the field is conservative in the first place? It's probably better to show that curl F = 0 (I haven't done the computation for this particular field).

As for finding the scalar function (assuming that the field if converative) I would start by writing the field as:

[tex] \mathop F\limits^ \to = - \frac{x}{{\sqrt {x^2 + y^2 } }}\mathop i\limits^ \to + \frac{y}{{\sqrt {x^2 + y^2 } }}\mathop j\limits^ \to [/tex]

[tex] \nabla \phi \left( {x,y} \right) = \mathop F\limits^ \to [/tex]

To determine phi, there are various procedures. Here is the one I use.

[tex] \phi \left( {x,y} \right) = \int {\frac{{\partial \phi }}{{\partial x}}} dx[/tex]

[tex] = \int {\left( { - \frac{x}{{\sqrt {x^2 + y^2 } }}} \right)} dx[/tex] by definition since [tex]\nabla \phi \left( {x,y} \right) = \frac{{\partial \phi }}{{\partial x}}\mathop i\limits^ \to + \frac{{\partial \phi }}{{\partial y}}\mathop j\limits^ \to = \mathop F\limits^ \to[/tex]

[tex] = - \sqrt {x^2 + y^2 } + A\left( y \right) + c[/tex]

Now differentiate the above expression for phi with respect to y and you'll get some expression. But the expression you get is also equal to something else, it should be easy to deduce just what I'm referring to. Consider the components of F and the relation between phi and F, I highlighted it earlier in my post.

On second thought, I'm not so sure that grad(anything) = F. You could try to compute to curl to check if I'm wrong (I wouldn't be suprised it's 12:55 in the morning over here :zzz: ). But just from looking at the equation for F, it seems to lack some kind of necessary 'symmetry'. Nevermind, it's just me. Probably best to wait for some other responses. I hope that was of some help.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K