Solving for Block Position After 3.3J Work on Spring-Block System

  • Thread starter Thread starter mbrmbrg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the block's position after performing 3.3 J of work on a spring-block system, where a force of 89 N is applied to hold the block stationary at x = -2.0 cm. The spring constant is determined to be -4450 N/m using the relationship between force and displacement. The final positions of the block are calculated to be +/- 4.3 cm. The work-energy theorem is applied to explain the relationship between the work done on the spring and the elastic potential energy stored in it.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Familiarity with the work-energy theorem
  • Basic knowledge of elastic potential energy calculations
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving work and energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Hooke's Law in spring systems
  • Learn about the work-energy theorem and its implications in mechanical systems
  • Explore elastic potential energy calculations in various contexts
  • Investigate the concept of conservative and non-conservative forces in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of spring-block systems and energy transfer in mechanical systems.

mbrmbrg
Messages
486
Reaction score
2
In the figure below, we must apply a force of magnitude 89 N to hold the block stationary at x = -2.0 cm. From that position we then slowly move the block so that our force does +3.3 J of work on the spring-block system; the block is then again stationary. What is the block's position? (There are two answers.)

The figure is a block resting on a horizontal surface, attatched to a horizontal spring.

-our force=spring force=-kd
so -89J=-k(-0.02m)==>k=-4450N/m

I then said that [tex]W=-(k\frac{x_f^2}{2}-k\frac{x_i^2}{2})[/tex], subbed in W=3.3 J, k=-4450N/m, x_i=-0.02m, and got the right answer (which is +/- 4.3cm).
But why did that equation work? 3.3 J is our work, not the spring's?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mbrmbrg said:
In the figure below, we must apply a force of magnitude 89 N to hold the block stationary at x = -2.0 cm. From that position we then slowly move the block so that our force does +3.3 J of work on the spring-block system; the block is then again stationary. What is the block's position? (There are two answers.)

The figure is a block resting on a horizontal surface, attatched to a horizontal spring.

-our force=spring force=-kd
so -89J=-k(-0.02m)==>k=-4450N/m

I then said that [tex]W=-(k\frac{x_f^2}{2}-k\frac{x_i^2}{2})[/tex], subbed in W=3.3 J, k=-4450N/m, x_i=-0.02m, and got the right answer (which is +/- 4.3cm).
But why did that equation work? 3.3 J is our work, not the spring's?
Yes, that is the work done by the person on the spring, The work results in stored elastic potential energy in the spring. If you look at the work energy theorem
[tex]W_{net} = \Delta K.E.[/tex] and since there is no KE change,
[tex]W_{net} = 0[/tex]. But the net work is the sum of the work by the conservative forces (spring force) and non conservative forces (the 'we' pushing force). They must therefore be equal and opposite. We do so many joules of work, and the spring force does the same in the other direction.
Alternatively, you can use the total work energy method
[tex]KE_i + PE_{gravity}_i +PE_{spring}_i = KE_f + PE_{gravity}_f +PE_{spring}_f + W_{n.c.}[/tex]
and since there is no kinetic or gravitational potential energy change, you get the same result for the work done by "we".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K