Solving for Kinetic Energy at Top of Loop-the-Loop

  • Thread starter Thread starter dkgojackets
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bead Loop
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the kinetic energy of a bead at the top of a loop-the-loop, where the bead exerts an upward force of mg/2 on the track. Participants analyze the forces acting on the bead, noting that the net force must account for both the bead's weight and the upward force it exerts. Initial calculations led to confusion, with some arriving at an incorrect kinetic energy value of mgr/4. However, through clarification, it was established that the total downward force is 3mg/2, resulting in the correct kinetic energy of 3mgr/4 at the top of the loop. The key takeaway is the importance of accurately interpreting the forces involved in the problem.
dkgojackets
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A bead slides without friction around a loop-the-loop. The bead is released at height y from the bottom of the loop, which has radius r. What is the instantaneous kinetic energy K at the top of the loop so that the bead would press the track with an upward force F=mg/2?

Express the height y in terms of K, m, and r.

Homework Equations



K=.5mv^2
cent acceleration=(v^2)/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew a FBD with weight mg down and F mg/2 up. The sum was mg/2 down, which I set equal to m(v^2)/r. I arranged the equation to get v^2=gr/2, and plugged that into the kinetic energy equation, getting mgr/4 as the incorrect solution.

I was able to get the second part through energy conservation, setting mgy=2mgr + K and solving.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm. I get mgr/4 = KE at the top as well. We must be missing something.
 
According to the problem, the bead is pressing up. In other words, the bead overcomes its weight to push up on the wire.

According to your analysis, the bead is pressing down. If the bead is pressing up, then the weight force must already be canceled out by some force, with a resulting net force of \frac{mg}{2}. It just so happens, however, that your net force and the actual net force are equivalent. This is just a coincidence.

However, I do not understand why your answer is incorrect, because I am getting the same answer that you did, although with different reasoning. (EDIT: Never mind. See my later post for the error in my reasoning.)
 
Last edited:
So a total force of 3mg/2? That would make kinetic energy 3mgr/4, which seems right.
 
dkgojackets said:
So a total force of 3mg/2? That would make kinetic energy 3mgr/4, which seems right.
The total force is not that.

The problem is asking for the kinetic energy at the top of the loop.

<br /> KE_i + PE_i = KE_f<br />

Your analysis finds the instantaneous kinetic energy at the bottom of the loop. Now you need to solve for the kinetic energy at the top of the loop.

Here's the problem - when you found the net force of the bead, you had it going down. It should be going up. The problem tells you that the net force of the bead is upwards. Therefore, centripetal force is equal to mg/2. Your reasoning was slightly incorrect.
 
Saketh said:
The total force is not that.

The problem is asking for the kinetic energy at the top of the loop.

<br /> KE_i + PE_i = KE_f<br />

Your analysis finds the instantaneous kinetic energy at the bottom of the loop. Now you need to solve for the kinetic energy at the top of the loop.

Here's the problem - when you found the net force of the bead, you had it going down. It should be going up. The problem tells you that the net force of the bead is upwards. Therefore, centripetal force is equal to mg/2. Your reasoning was slightly incorrect.

Not so. The bead is pushing up on the track with a force of mg/2, so the track is pushing down on the bead with a force of mg/2 (Newton 3). This is added to the weight of the bead for a total downward force of 3mg/2, and that is the centripetal force at the top of the loop.

dkgojackets said:
So a total force of 3mg/2? That would make kinetic energy 3mgr/4, which seems right.

That looks right to me.
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K