Solving for n in Permutation Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter themadhatter1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Permutations
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves solving for n in a permutation equation, specifically (14)_{n}P_{3}=_{n+2}P_{4}. The context includes the use of factorials and the properties of permutations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss expanding factorials and canceling terms to simplify the equation. There is uncertainty about isolating n due to the complexity of factorials. Some participants question the correctness of denominators and the approach to setting equations to zero.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on manipulating the equation and questioning each other's steps. There is no explicit consensus, but various methods and interpretations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential errors in the setup of the equation and the implications of dividing by zero. The discussion reflects the challenges of working with factorials in permutation problems.

themadhatter1
Messages
139
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve for n.

[tex](14)_{n}P_{3}=_{n+2}P_{4}[/tex]

Homework Equations


[tex]_{n}P_{r}=\frac{n!}{(n-r)!}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



First I write the problem with the equations written out

[tex]\frac{14n!}{(n-3)!}=\frac{(n+2)!}{(n-2)!}[/tex]

I'm not quite sure how to isolate the n with all of the factorials going on.
If I subtract the RHS over to the left I get:

[tex]\frac{(n-2)!14n!-(n+2)!(n-3)!}{(n-2)!(n-3)!}[/tex]

Not sure if this is helpful or not.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Expand the factorials out a bit and cancel terms. For example,

[tex]\frac{(n+2)!}{(n-1)!} = \frac{(n+2)(n+1)n(n-1)!}{(n-1)!} = (n+2)(n+1)n[/tex]
 
vela said:
Expand the factorials out a bit and cancel terms. For example,

[tex]\frac{(n+2)!}{(n-1)!} = \frac{(n+2)(n+1)n(n-1)!}{(n-1)!} = (n+2)(n+1)n[/tex]

Do you have (n-1)! in the denominator by accident? because it really comes out to be (n-2)!.

Ok, I see your method,

[tex]\frac{14(n-3)!(n-2)(n-1)(n)}{(n-3)!}=\frac{(n-2)!(n-1)(n)(n+1)(n+2)}{(n-2)!}[/tex]

Some canceling and simplifying and you'll get

[tex]0=\frac{(n+1)(n+2)}{14(n-1)}[/tex]

and that doesn't divide nicely at all. Am I doing something wrong?
 
themadhatter1 said:
Do you have (n-1)! in the denominator by accident? because it really comes out to be (n-2)!.
It was just an example; it had nothing to do with the problem.
[tex]0=\frac{(n+1)(n+2)}{14(n-1)}[/tex]

and that doesn't divide nicely at all. Am I doing something wrong?
You don't need to divide. If the fraction is 0, that means the numerator is 0. What values of n make the top equal to 0?

Actually, the LHS shouldn't be 0. Check your work. I think your denominator is off too.
 
vela said:
It was just an example; it had nothing to do with the problem.

You don't need to divide. If the fraction is 0, that means the numerator is 0. What values of n make the top equal to 0?

Actually, the LHS shouldn't be 0. Check your work. I think your denominator is off too.

I originally had

[tex]14(n-2)(n-1)(n)=(n-1)(n)(n+1)(n+2)[/tex]

then I divided both sides by (n-2)(n-2)(n) to cancel terms and set one side equal to zero so I can solve for n.

Your right about the denomonator though it should be (n-2)14
 
themadhatter1 said:
I originally had

[tex]14(n-2)(n-1)(n)=(n-1)(n)(n+1)(n+2)[/tex]

then I divided both sides by (n-2)(n-2)(n) to cancel terms and set one side equal to zero so I can solve for n.

Your right about the denomonator though it should be (n-2)14
You can't just arbitrarily set one side equal to 0. If you just cancel the factors common to both sides, you get

[tex]14(n-2) = (n+1)(n+2)[/tex]

How would you solve that?
 
themadhatter1 said:
well I didn't just set a side equal to zero. I actually divided both sides of the equation by the same thing. Thats ok right?
Yes, as long as you're not dividing by 0. I added to my previous post, so you may want to look at it again.
 
Ahh Foil out and move to one side.

so you get

[tex]0=n^2-11n+30[/tex]
[tex]0=(n-5)(n-6)[/tex]

therefore n=5,6 and that's what the answer is supposed to be.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K