Solving for R2: Calculating Vector Cross Product

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation and understanding of the vector R2, specifically its representation and magnitude. Participants explore the relationship between the vector and its magnitude, while also addressing the confusion regarding the vector cross product.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that R2 = 1.043j - 1.143k cannot equal a scalar value of 1.547, but rather implies that the magnitude of the vector R2 is approximately 1.547.
  • Another participant emphasizes the distinction between vector notation and scalar magnitude, suggesting that the original post's notation is close to unit vector notation.
  • A participant notes that the magnitude of a vector is calculated as the square root of the sum of the squares of its components, reiterating that the discussion does not involve the cross product.
  • The original poster acknowledges a need for further understanding of vectors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the distinction between vectors and their magnitudes, but there is some confusion regarding the relevance of the cross product in this context. The discussion remains somewhat unresolved regarding the original poster's understanding.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights a lack of clarity in the original post regarding vector notation and the application of the cross product, which is not relevant to the calculation of the magnitude of a single vector.

hatchelhoff
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I am trying to figure out the following
If R2 = 1.043j -1.143k
Then how can
R2 = 1.547
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hatchelhoff said:
I am trying to figure out the following
If R2 = 1.043j -1.143k
Then how can
R2 = 1.547
A vector can't be equal to a number. However, [itex]\vec R_2=1.043\vec j-1.143\vec k[/itex] implies that [itex]|\vec R_2|\approx 1.547[/itex]. This follows immediately from the definition of [itex]|\vec x|[/itex] for arbitrary [itex]\vec x[/itex], or if you prefer, from the Pythagorean theorem. It doesn't have anything to do with the cross product.
 
Not that there is anything wrong with Fredrik's post above, but my guess is that if you (the OP) don't know what's going on in your own post, then you won't understand the reply.

Fredrik used correct notation to show when talking about a vector and when talking about the magnitude of a vector. Your first mention of R2 is close to being in unit vector notation (without the overhead arrows or crowns or whatever convention). The second time you are simply stating the magnitude of the vector R2.

The magnitude of the vector is the square root of the squares of the magnitudes of the components. Nothing you have posted has anything to do with a cross product, which is an operation on two vectors.
 
Thanks lads, I have have a bit to learn about vectors.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K