MHB Solving for Unit Vectors in U Given Vector 1 and Matrix S

Click For Summary
To find the unitary matrix U given vector 1 and matrix S, start by recognizing that U's columns must form an orthonormal basis. With vector 1 provided as v1, the next step is to identify two additional vectors, v2 and v3, to complete the basis in $\mathbb{C}^3$. A common approach is to use the Gram-Schmidt process, beginning with a non-orthonormal basis, such as w2=(0,1,0) and w3=(0,0,1). The construction in the notes likely aligns with this method, suggesting that matrix S can be utilized to derive the necessary vectors. Ultimately, applying these steps will yield the complete unitary matrix U.
cylers89
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
So I am given the vector 1...but I need to find vector 2 and 3, in order to find U=(v1, v2, v3), and U is a unitary matrix.

Vector 1 is: (1/2+1/2i 1/2 1/2i)^T

The example from my notes shows me how to find U, but I am also given a matrix S to start with...

Any clue where to start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cylers89 said:
So I am given the vector 1...but I need to find vector 2 and 3, in order to find U=(v1, v2, v3), and U is a unitary matrix.

Vector 1 is: (1/2+1/2i 1/2 1/2i)^T

The example from my notes shows me how to find U, but I am also given a matrix S to start with...

Any clue where to start?
A unitary matrix is one whose columns (or rows) form an orthonormal basis for the underlying space. So if the first column v1 is given, then you need to make that the first vector of an orthonormal basis for $\mathbb{C}^3$. The other two vectors v2 and v3 in that basis will then give you the remaining columns of U.

The standard way to construct such a basis is to start with a (non-orthnormal) basis $\{v_1,w_2,w_3\}$ and apply the Gram–Schmidt process to it. You could for example take $w_2=(0,1,0)$ and $w_3=(0,0,1).$

I don't know how the construction in your notes works, but I am guessing that if you take the matrix S to have columns v1, w2 and w3, then that construction will effectively be the same as the Gram–Schmidt construction that I would use.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K