Solving for Work and Friction in Kinetic Energy Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter mohabitar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a physics problem involving work done by friction and kinetic energy equations. The user initially misapplies the kinetic energy formula, incorrectly assuming that work by friction equals the change in kinetic energy (delta K). Key insights include the necessity of drawing a free body diagram to identify forces and the correct calculation of the normal force as mg cos 33 degrees. The final resolution emphasizes that work is calculated as the dot product of the friction force and displacement, with the friction force needing to be considered as negative due to its opposing direction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy equations
  • Ability to draw and interpret free body diagrams
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the work-energy theorem
  • Learn how to effectively draw and analyze free body diagrams
  • Explore the concept of frictional force and its calculation in inclined planes
  • Investigate the significance of the dot product in physics calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone seeking to understand the application of work and energy principles in real-world scenarios.

mohabitar
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
ARjYs.png


I'm having trouble with numer 3. So work by friction is equal to delta K, which is equal to .5mv^2. So I used the kinematics equation v^2=u^2 + 2ad, where u^2 is the velocity found in number 2 squared. Then I plug in this value of v^2 into the kinetic energy equation to find work, but its not coming up as the right answer. Any ideas?

Maybe I'm using the wrong value for acceleration? I've tried many methods for finding a, such as a=u[k]N or a=T/m, but none seem to work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mohabitar said:
ARjYs.png


I'm having trouble with numer 3. So work by friction is equal to delta K which is equal to .5mv^2.
no, that is not correct. Net work done is delta K, which includes the work done by all forces.
So I used the kinematics equation v^2=u^2 + 2ad, where u^2 is the velocity found in number 2 squared. Then I plug in this value of v^2 into the kinetic energy equation to find work, but its not coming up as the right answer. Any ideas?

Maybe I'm using the wrong value for acceleration? I've tried many methods for finding a, such as a=u[k]N or a=T/m, but none seem to work.
To find the acceleration. you have to draw a free body diagram of all forces acting. But you don't need to find the acceleration. Just find the friction force, then W_friction = dot product of friction force times displacemnt.
 
Ok so about that free body diagram. This is a weird angle situation. So I have that upper angle as 33, so should the actual angle to the horizontal for finding mg be 90-33=57? So would Normal force be mgcos57? Or am I doing this wrong
 
mohabitar said:
Ok so about that free body diagram. This is a weird angle situation. So I have that upper angle as 33, so should the actual angle to the horizontal for finding mg be 90-33=57? So would Normal force be mgcos57? Or am I doing this wrong
The gravity force, mg, acting on the block, always points vertically down, toward Earth's center, regardless of whether the block is on a flat or sloped surface. It's the normal force that changes when on the incline. Since there is no movement of the block on the incline in the direction perpendicular to the incline, the normal force acting on it , perpendicular to the incline, must be equal and opposite to the algebraic sum of the components of all other forces perpendicular to the incline, per Newton 1. In this case, since friction and tension forces are parallel to the incline, then only the gravity force is the other force which has a component perpendicular to the incline, and that component is not mg cos 57, it's (mg)(___??___).
 
Well I've tried mgcos57, mgcos33, mgsin33, mgsin57, but none of those worked. Am I still missing it?
 
mohabitar said:
Well I've tried mgcos57, mgcos33, mgsin33, mgsin57, but none of those worked. Am I still missing it?
mgcos33 is the same as mgsin57; mgcos57 is the same as mgsin33. So essentially, you have 2 choices...is the gravity component, perpendicular to the incline, mgcoscos33 or mgcos57? Now since I've already noted that mgcos57 is wrong, then by elimination, it's mgcos 33, and the the normal force must be mgcos33 acting toward the block perpendicular to the incline, per Newton 1.. You should prove this to yourself by using geometry and trig...it is sometimes not readily apparent. Now calculate the friction force, and then, the work done by it.
 
Ok I'm still not getting the right answer. Work is force * displacement, so the friction force is u[k]N, which we said to be .3*mgcos33 *1.6 m, which gives 51.33, but that's not the right answer.
 
mohabitar said:
Ok I'm still not getting the right answer. Work is force * displacement, so the friction force is u[k]N, which we said to be .3*mgcos33 *1.6 m, which gives 51.33, but that's not the right answer.
Call its magnitude 51.3 N, or even 50 N , using significant figures, but what is the direction of the friction force and what is the direction of its movement? Remember Work is the dot product of Force and Dispalcement.
 
Ah ok I see this should be negative. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K