# Net work and kinetic energy (pushing a wagon to accelerate it)

• aqryus
In summary, the conversation discusses the confusion of using different values for work in the kinetic energy equation and questions why friction is not taken into account. The expert confirms that the net work equals the change in kinetic energy and asks for clarification on the answer and the mass of the wagon.
aqryus
Homework Statement
Bill does 500J of work on a wagon, friction does work of -200J. What is the final speed of the wagon if it starts at rest?
Relevant Equations
w=fdcostheta
Ek=1/2mv^2
I'm a little confused because my teacher used Bill's 500J of work for the kinetic energy equation and I don't understand why. I used the net work, so 300J, to find the speed and I'm not sure why that's wrong. Wouldn't friction make the wagon move slower than if there was no friction? So why isn't that accounted for in the kinetic energy equation to find speed? Thank you

You are correct. The net work done on the wagon equals the change in the kinetic energy of the wagon. What did you get for the answer? Was the mass of the wagon specified?

• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
754
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
884
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
33
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
56
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K