Solving Free Particle Action with Feynman & Gibbs

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the first exercise from Feynman & Gibbs, which involves deriving the action for a free particle. Participants highlight the challenge of using integration by parts and the Euler-Lagrange equations to find the extremal path, ultimately confirming that the motion is constant velocity. The correct expression for the action is clarified as S = (m/2) * ((x_b - x_a)^2 / (t_b - t_a)), emphasizing the importance of starting from fundamental definitions. The conversation also reassures that using known solutions is valid, as the principle of least action applies to different paths. Overall, the exercise aims to reinforce understanding of kinetic energy and the relationship between action and motion.
gulsen
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
I've recently started Feynman & Gibbs. I was sure exercises will be fun, but i can't enjoy myself when i fail solving the first one! Exercise 1-1 says: show that free particle action is

\frac{m}{2} \frac{x_b^2 - x_a^2}{t_b-t_a}

I tried finding anti-derivative of \dot x^2, ended up with x\dot x - \int x d(\dot x) via integration by parts. Couldn't do much about the integral. Of course, I know the solution, and can show it using Euler-Lagrange equations, x=vt where v is a constant (taking x_0=0). I can "solve" the question by substituting x in the action integral

S = \int_{t_a}^{t_b} \frac{m}{2}v^2 dt

but i suppose this counts as cheating --kinda solving backwards.

Any ideas on how this kind of stuff can be solved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not cheating. The action have different values on different paths. The principle of least action claims that the actual path will extremize the action.

They want you to find the path that extremizes the action by using the usual Euler-Lagrange equations. You know the answer should be motion of constant velocity, x = xa + vt, where v = const = (xb-xa)/(tb-ta). Then you plug that in and evaluate the action on that path.
 
Last edited:
gulsen said:
I've recently started Feynman & Gibbs. I was sure exercises will be fun, but i can't enjoy myself when i fail solving the first one! Exercise 1-1 says: show that free particle action is

\frac{m}{2} \frac{x_b^2 - x_a^2}{t_b-t_a}
Shouldn't it be:

\frac{m}{2} \frac{(x_b - x_a)^2}{t_b-t_a}
...
Any ideas on how this kind of stuff can be solved?
The exercise asks you to find the action S. How S is defined? It's defined as

S = \int_{t_a}^{t_b} \L dt

where L = T - V; T = kinetic energy and V = potential energy;

In this case, V = 0 and T = \frac{m}{2}v^2 and to write kinetic energy you surely don't need Eulero-Lagrange equations, I hope, kinetic energy is defined in that way!

So:

S = \int_{t_a}^{t_b} \frac{m}{2}v^2 dt

Where is the problem? Always start from definitions.
 
Last edited:
This looks wrong but the equation of motion here is \ddot{x}=0, so:

<br /> S=\frac{m}{2}\int_{t_{a}}^{t_{b}}\dot{x}^{2}dt=\left[ x\dot{x}\right]_{t_{a}}^{t_{b}}-\int_{t_{a}}^{t_{b}}x\ddot{x}dt<br />

Now in second integral is zero by the equation of motion. Not too sure where to go from here.
 
hunt_mat said:
This looks wrong but the equation of motion here is \ddot{x}=0, so:

<br /> S=\frac{m}{2}\int_{t_{a}}^{t_{b}}\dot{x}^{2}dt=\left[ x\dot{x}\right]_{t_{a}}^{t_{b}}-\int_{t_{a}}^{t_{b}}x\ddot{x}dt<br />

Now in second integral is zero by the equation of motion. Not too sure where to go from here.

Remember that \dot{x} is the same at the initial time and final time, since \ddot{x}=0.

So you get \left[ x\dot{x}\right]_{t_{a}}^{t_{b}}=\dot{x}(x_b-x_a)=\frac{(x_b-x_a)^2}{t_b-t_a}

So you can check that the derivative of the action:

S=\frac{m}{2}\frac{(x_b-x_a)^2}{t_b-t_a}

with respect to x_b equals momentum, and with respect to time equals negative energy (which in this case is just kinetic).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
844
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K