MHB Solving Friction Problem: Mass 5kg Trolley, 25° Slope, Coefficient 0.4

AI Thread Summary
A 5 kg trolley is rolling up a 25° slope with a coefficient of friction of 0.4, initially at 12 m/s. The acceleration while moving uphill is calculated as -7.85 m/s² due to the opposing forces of gravity and friction. To find the speed on the return down the slope, the distance traveled uphill is determined to be 9.17 m. The acceleration during the descent is positive, calculated using the same forces but with the direction reversed. The final speed as the trolley passes point A on its way back down can be derived from these values.
Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
A trolley of mass 5 kg is rolling up a rough slope, which is at an angle of 25 degree to the horizontal. The coefficient of friction between the trolley and the slope is 0.4. It passes a point A with speed 12m/s. Find its speed when it passes A on its way back down the slope.
So I did F=m×a
-0.4×50cos25- 50sin25= 5a
a=-7.85m/s^2.
I don't know how to calculate after this. Pls help
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
let uphill be positive …

initial velocity > 0, acceleration < 0

$a = -g(\sin{\theta} + \mu\cos{\theta})$

$\Delta x = \dfrac{0^2-12^2}{2a} = 9.17 \, m$let downhill be positive …

initial velocity = 0, final velocity > 0, acceleration > 0, delta x > 0

$a = g(\sin{\theta} - \mu \cos{\theta})$

$v_f = \sqrt{ 0^2 + 2a \Delta x}$
 
skeeter said:
let uphill be positive …

initial velocity > 0, acceleration < 0

$a = -g(\sin{\theta} + \mu\cos{\theta})$

$\Delta x = \dfrac{0^2-12^2}{2a} = 9.17 \, m$let downhill be positive …

initial velocity = 0, final velocity > 0, acceleration > 0, delta x > 0

$a = g(\sin{\theta} - \mu \cos{\theta})$

$v_f = \sqrt{ 0^2 + 2a \Delta x}$
Thank you so much!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top