Solving FT of Decaying Exp: Lorentzian Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amok
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
10 replies · 2K views
Amok
Messages
254
Reaction score
1
I had to show that:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-a \left | t \right |} e^{\omega t} \mathrm{d} t[/tex]

with a positive, is equal to a Lorentzian function.

I simply did this:

[tex] <br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-a \left | t \right |} e^{i\omega t} \mathrm{d} t = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{(-a + i\omega) t} \mathrm{d} t + \int_{-\infty}^{0} e^{(a + i\omega)t } \mathrm{d} t<br /> = \frac{-1}{i\omega\ -a} + \frac{1}{i\omega + a} + \lim_{x \to -\infty} e^{(-a + i\omega )x} - \lim_{y \to +\infty} = \frac{2a}{\omega^2 + a^2} + \lim_{x \to +\infty} e^{-ax} lim_{x \to +\infty} e^{i\omega} - \lim_{y \to -\infty} e^{ax} \lim_{y \to -\infty} e^{i\omega} = \frac{2a}{\omega^2 + a^2}[/tex]

Is this correct? I'm asking because I've seen people do this by using Euler's formula and then calculating an integral with a cosine in it, but I don't really see the point of that.

EDIT: can you guys see the whole thing? I can't, what should I do?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're fine up to here:

[tex]\frac{-1}{i\omega\ -a} + \frac{1}{i\omega + a} + \lim_{t \to \infty} e^{(-a+i\omega)t} - \lim_{t \to -\infty} e^{(a+i\omega)t}[/tex]

Then you just need to say the two limits are equal to 0.

What you can't do is split the limits up like you did:

[tex]\lim_{t \to \infty} e^{(-a+i\omega)t} \Rightarrow \lim_{t \to \infty} e^{-at}\lim_{t \to \infty} e^{i\omega t}[/tex]

You can only say lim AB = (lim A)(lim B) if both lim A and lim B exist. In this case, the complex exponential oscillates and doesn't converge as t goes to infinity, so the limit doesn't exist.
 
Or, to add a little detail:

|e(-a+iω)t| = |e-at||eiωt| = |e-at| → 0 as t → ∞

and similarly for the other one.
 
vela said:
[tex]\lim_{t \to \infty} e^{(-a+i\omega)t} \Rightarrow \lim_{t \to \infty} e^{-at}\lim_{t \to \infty} e^{i\omega t}[/tex]

You can only say lim AB = (lim A)(lim B) if both lim A and lim B exist. In this case, the complex exponential oscillates and doesn't converge as t goes to infinity, so the limit doesn't exist.

That's what I thought, so how do I show that the limit does exist?
 
Do what LCKurtz did.
 
But how did he introduce the modulus in the calculations?
 
If |z| → 0 then doesn't that show z → 0?
 
Of course it does! Thank you guys.
 
LCKurtz said:
If |z| → 0 then doesn't that show z → 0?

I'm sorry to bring thus up again, but I can see that what you're saying is true, simply by picturing the polar form of a complex number on a complex plane, but how do you prove what you're saying? How can you really write it down?
 
Doesn't z → 0 mean |z - 0| gets small?
 
It mosta certainly does. The modulus of my function is

[tex]\left| e^{-at} \right|[/tex]

which does become arbitrarily small as t goes to infinity. I hadn't given much though to limits of complex functions for a while. This was good practice. Thank you very much Kurtz.