Solving Gradient Problem (c): LHS ≠ RHS

  • Thread starter Thread starter NewtonApple
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inequality \(\overrightarrow{r} \cdot (\nabla \cdot \overrightarrow{r}) \neq (r \nabla) r\). Participants clarify that the left-hand side (LHS) evaluates to \(3 \overrightarrow{r}\) while the right-hand side (RHS) simplifies to \(\overrightarrow{r}\). The confusion arises from the misinterpretation of the notation, particularly the distinction between the dot product and the operation involving the gradient operator. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the expressions are not equivalent due to the differing mathematical operations involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically gradient and divergence operations.
  • Familiarity with vector notation and operations in three-dimensional space.
  • Knowledge of the properties of scalar and vector fields.
  • Ability to differentiate functions of multiple variables using partial derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the gradient operator in vector calculus.
  • Learn about the divergence of vector fields and its implications.
  • Explore the differences between scalar and vector products in vector algebra.
  • Review examples of vector calculus problems involving gradients and divergences.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics and physics, particularly those studying vector calculus, as well as educators looking for clarification on vector operations and notation.

NewtonApple
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


image024.gif
[/B]
Solving part (c) which should be
\overrightarrow{r}.(\nabla.\overrightarrow{r)}\neq\left(r\nabla\right)r

2. Homework Equations


Let \nabla=\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}

and \overrightarrow{r}=x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}
r = \mid r\mid=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Consider left side of the inequality.

Now \nabla.\overrightarrow{r}=<br /> (\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}<br /> ).\left(x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}\right)=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial z}{\partial z}=1+1+1=3

L.H.S. =\overrightarrow{r}.(\nabla.\overrightarrow{r})

L.H.S. = \left(\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\right).3=3\overrightarrow{r}


Now consider right side of the inequality.

\left(r\nabla\right)=\left(\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}\right)\left(\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\right)

\left(r\nabla\right) =\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}

\left(r\nabla\right)=\hat{i}\frac{2x}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{j}\frac{2y}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{k}\frac{2z}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}

\left(r\nabla\right)=<br /> \hat{i}x\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{j}y\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{k}z\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}

\left(r\nabla\right)=\frac{x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}}{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}}

R.H.S. =r\left(r\nabla\right)=\left(\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}\right)\frac{x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}}{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}}=\overrightarrow{r}

Hence L.H.S. \neq R.H.S.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NewtonApple said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 77205 [/B]
Solving part (c) which should be
\overrightarrow{r}.(\nabla.\overrightarrow{r)}\neq\left(r\nabla\right)r
That still can't be right. See below.

Consider left side of the inequality.

Now \nabla.\overrightarrow{r}=<br /> (\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}<br /> ).\left(x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}\right)=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial z}{\partial z}=1+1+1=3

L.H.S. =\overrightarrow{r}.(\nabla.\overrightarrow{r})

L.H.S. = \left(\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\right).3=3\overrightarrow{r}
Your last line is incorrect. You found ##\nabla\cdot\vec{r} = 3##, so you should have ##\vec{r}\cdot(\nabla\cdot\vec{r}) = \vec{r}\cdot 3##, which doesn't make sense because you can't dot a vector with a scalar.
Now consider right side of the inequality.

\left(r\nabla\right)=\left(\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}\right)\left(\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\right)

\left(r\nabla\right) =\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
You can't change the order of ##r## and ##\nabla##. The expression on the RHS is equal to ##\nabla r##, not ##r \nabla##.

\left(r\nabla\right)=\hat{i}\frac{2x}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{j}\frac{2y}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{k}\frac{2z}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}

\left(r\nabla\right)=<br /> \hat{i}x\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{j}y\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{k}z\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}

\left(r\nabla\right)=\frac{x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}}{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}}
What you actually calculated is ##\nabla r = \hat{r}##. It's not for nothing, however, as you need this to correctly evaluate the righthand side.

R.H.S. =r\left(r\nabla\right)=\left(\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}\right)\frac{x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}}{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}}=\overrightarrow{r}

Hence L.H.S. \neq R.H.S.
The RHS you started with was ##r\nabla r##. At the end, you incorrectly say it's ##r(r\nabla)##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NewtonApple
Thx Vela! I'll give it another try.

There is a misprint in the problem statement.
image024.gif

I think (c) part should be \overrightarrow{r}.(\nabla.\overrightarrow{r)}\neq\left(r\nabla\right)r
Are you OK with it?
 
No.
 
NewtonApple said:
##r = \mid r\mid=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}##
In the photocopied text, all occurrences of 'r' are in bold, implying vectors.
 
In your chapter 1 in the Chow book, under "Formulas involving ##\nabla## " , you find ##\nabla\cdot {\bf r} = 3## and ##({\bf A}\cdot \nabla){\bf r} = {\bf A}## for A any differentiable vector field function. Substituting ##{\bf A} = {\bf r}## gives ##({\bf r}\cdot \nabla){\bf r} = {\bf r}##.

##{\bf r} \cdot (\nabla\cdot {\bf r}) ## would be a vector dotted into a scalar. Doesn't make sense.

And in ##({\bf r} \nabla){\bf r} = {\bf r}## the ##({\bf r} \nabla){\bf r}## (without the ##\cdot## ) could be a matrix for all we know.

As in 1.18(b), mr Chow seems to be a bit sloppy, or at least inconsistent with his notation. Best I can make of it is that he wants you to prove that
##{\bf r} \; (\nabla\cdot {\bf r}) \ne ({\bf r} \cdot \nabla)\;{\bf r} ##, which by now should be a piece of cake for you :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NewtonApple

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K