Solving Harmonic Oscillator Coefficients w/ Hermite Polynomials

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving coefficients of Hermite polynomials in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically addressing a summation that leads to the conclusion that coefficients for each power of y must be zero. The summation provided is \\sum_{n=-\\infty}^\\infty [(k+2)(k+1)c_{k+2} + (2 \\epsilon -2k -1)c_{k}] y^k = 0. The method to demonstrate this involves evaluating the derivatives at y=0, which is a standard approach in the analysis of power series and polynomial coefficients.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermite polynomials
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of power series and their derivatives
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Hermite polynomials in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about power series and their convergence criteria
  • Study the method of evaluating derivatives to find polynomial coefficients
  • Explore LaTeX formatting for mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists working with Hermite polynomials, and anyone involved in mathematical physics or computational methods in quantum theory.

Sojourner01
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
Ok, fairly basic quantum mechanics assignment.

One question deals with (I think) the coefficients of the Hermite polynomial. Unfortunately, the lecturer hasn't told us anything about this method, so I donn't know what it's called or what the point of it is, and it's not in any of the examples of Hermite polynomials I can find.

I have the summation:

[tex]\\sum_{n=-\\infty}^\\infty [(k+2)(k+1)c_{k+2} + (2 \\epsilon -2k -1)c_{k}] y^k = 0[/tex]

Show that the above implies that the coefficients for each power of y are themselves zero, by considering the derivatives of [] evaluated at y=0?

It'd be nice if I knew what these damn numbers were. It'd be even nicer if I knew what this was called so I could look it up.

edit: well, I can't get the LaTex to display what I want, but I hope you get the idea...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use a single backslash before LaTeX command:
[tex]\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty [(k+2)(k+1)c_{k+2} + (2 \epsilon -2k -1)c_{k}] y^k = 0[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K