Solving Homogeneous Linear ODEs using Annihilators - Comments

  • Insights
  • Thread starter Mark44
  • Start date

Answers and Replies

  • #2
ElijahRockers
Gold Member
270
10
I'm having a hard time seeing what the point is. It looks to me that the annihilators are the same thing as the characteristic equation.

What am I missing?
 
  • #3
34,552
6,265
I'm having a hard time seeing what the point is. It looks to me that the annihilators are the same thing as the characteristic equation.

What am I missing?
The differential equation in operator notation is closely related to the characteristic equation. With homogeneous diff. equations, there isn't much point, but you can use annihilators to convert some nonhomogeneous diff. equations to a higher-order homogeneous equation. That is covered in the second article, Solving Nonhomogeneous Linear ODEs using Annihilators.
 
  • Like
Likes ElijahRockers
  • #4
Thank you very much for your artical. Please teach about "Series Solutions‐ Frobenius‘ Method".
 
  • #5
1
0
typo. 1/2i(cos(t)+isin(t))+1/2i(cos(t)–isin(t))=sin(t) has + instead of -. Should be -1/2i(cos(t)–isin(t))
 
  • #6
34,552
6,265
typo. 1/2i(cos(t)+isin(t))+1/2i(cos(t)–isin(t))=sin(t) has + instead of -. Should be -1/2i(cos(t)–isin(t))
Thank you for spotting this. I have fixed this typo as well as another in that section.
 
  • #7
1
0
Hi! I am new to physicsforum. I am not sure how to post a reply/question on the article page so I am doing it here. I am also not very good at math at the moment.

My question is suppose we do not make any assumptions (that the solution is in the form y = e^(rt)), using the annihilator method, how do I find the general solution?

For example, in example 1, by assuming the solution takes the form of e^(rt), we can solve for r since r is a number. But without making this assumption, how do i get the solution y = c e^(3t) from (D-3)y = 0?
 
  • #8
9
1
Hi! I am new to physicsforum. I am not sure how to post a reply/question on the article page so I am doing it here. I am also not very good at math at the moment.

My question is suppose we do not make any assumptions (that the solution is in the form y = e^(rt)), using the annihilator method, how do I find the general solution?

For example, in example 1, by assuming the solution takes the form of e^(rt), we can solve for r since r is a number. But without making this assumption, how do i get the solution y = c e^(3t) from (D-3)y = 0?
You need to take into consideration the homogenous part of the equation. Let's take y=yc + yp, why yc is the homogenous part of the equation. You take the annihlator for the right hand side of the original equation and multiply both sides by that, giving you 0 on the right hand side and the differential operators on the left hand side. Next you find all the possible solutions for D where the right hand side would equal to 0. After you have all the values for D such that the right hand side gives you 0 you right out the solutions like you would for an ODE, and you just eliminate the solutions that are repeating from the homogenous part and keep the non repeating solutions as the "guess" to the trial function that you need for the particular solution. Thereafter you can use the left hand and use the method of undetermined co-efficients.
 
  • #9
34,552
6,265
For example, in example 1, by assuming the solution takes the form of e^(rt), we can solve for r since r is a number. But without making this assumption, how do i get the solution y = c e^(3t) from (D-3)y = 0?
If you are working with a linear, constant coefficient, homogeneous differential equation, it is reasonable to assume that the solution has the form y = cert.

(D - 3)y = 0
is the same as Dy - 3y = 0, or equivalently, y' = 3y, where y' means ##\frac{dy}{dt}##.
The DE y' = 3y is separable, and can be solved fairly easily to get the general solution: y(t) = Ce3t.
 

Related Threads on Solving Homogeneous Linear ODEs using Annihilators - Comments

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
12K
Replies
0
Views
340
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
28
Views
14K
Top