Solving Incomplete Integral: Easy Steps and Tips | Andishe9

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hamid1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complete
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an incomplete integral problem, where the original poster seeks assistance in completing their solution. The subject area is calculus, specifically focusing on integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the original poster's approach to the integral, with one participant questioning the validity of a specific step in the solution. Suggestions for alternative methods, such as u-substitution, are also mentioned.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's work and exploring different methods to approach the integral. There is no clear consensus yet, as various interpretations and suggestions are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of potential misunderstandings in the original poster's reasoning, and some participants are addressing these assumptions. The original poster's link to the problem is also noted as problematic, prompting requests for a clearer presentation of the integral.

Hamid1
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
can anybody complete my answer?(I'm unable to solve the second part of the integral)
problem and answer(incomplete) : www.andishe9.com/integral.bmp[/URL]

thanks and excuse me for english;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hamid1 said:
Hi all,
can anybody complete my answer?(I'm unable to solve the second part of the integral)
problem and answer(incomplete) : www.andishe9.com/integral.bmp[/URL]

thanks and excuse me for english;)[/QUOTE]

Hi Hamid1! Welcome to PF! :smile:

[SIZE="1"](have an integral: ∫ :wink:)

your link isn't working …

can you please type out your answer?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you,
I checked the link.It works...
 
ermmm...your very first line is incorrect: your basically claiming that (2x+6)-6=1 which is clearly false.

Try a u-substitution of the form u=x+3 instead.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K