paulmdrdo1
- 382
- 0
how would start solving this
$\displaystyle\int\frac{dy}{1+e^y}$
$\displaystyle\int\frac{dy}{1+e^y}$
The discussion revolves around solving the indefinite integral $\displaystyle\int\frac{dy}{1+e^y}$. Participants explore various methods of integration, including substitution and manipulation of the integrand. The conversation includes both theoretical approaches and practical examples.
Participants do not reach a consensus on a single method for solving the integral, as multiple approaches are presented and debated. There is also some confusion regarding the equivalence of different forms of the final answer, indicating a lack of agreement on the interpretation of logarithmic properties.
Some participants' methods involve assumptions about the manipulation of integrands and the properties of logarithms, which may not be universally accepted or understood. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with integration techniques and algebraic manipulation.
This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners interested in integration techniques, particularly those exploring indefinite integrals involving exponential functions and logarithmic properties.
Divide numerator and denominator by e^y.\displaystyle \int\frac{dy}{1+e^y}
paulmdrdo said:how would start solving this
$\displaystyle\int\frac{dy}{1+e^y}$
paulmdrdo said:how did you know that you have to divide the numerator and denominator by e^y?
what if we have
$\displaystyle\int\frac{e^2x}{1+e^x}dx$
Prove It said:Alternatively, MULTIPLY top and bottom by \displaystyle \begin{align*} e^y \end{align*}, giving
\displaystyle \begin{align*} \int{ \frac{e^y\,dy}{e^y + \left( e^y \right) ^2}} \end{align*}
which gives a form that a very simple substitution of \displaystyle \begin{align*} u = e^y \implies du = e^y\,dy \end{align*} should be able to handle.
How did we know to do this? Well, since there's an \displaystyle \begin{align*}e^y \end{align*} function, and we know that it's its own derivative, that means if we were to make any substitution using it, it also needs to appear as a factor, as when we do an integration by substitution, the derivative of the function we are substituting needs to be a factor of the entire function being integrated.
- - - Updated - - -
Am I correct in assuming that you meant \displaystyle \begin{align*} \int{ \frac{e^{2x}}{1 + e^x}\,dx} \end{align*}?
paulmdrdo said:yes.sorry for typo error!
MarkFL said:Using the properties of logs, we may transform the form given by soroban into that which you found:
$$-\ln\left(e^{-y}+1 \right)+C=-\ln\left(\frac{e^y+1}{e^y} \right)+C=-\ln\left(\frac{e^y}{e^y+1} \right)+C$$
paulmdrdo said:mark my answer is positive $\displaystyle ln\left(\frac{e^y}{e^y+1}\right)+C$ not $\displaystyle -ln\left(\frac{e^y}{e^y+1}\right)+C$ why is that?