Solving Indices Problem in QFT

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter anony
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indices Qft
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion addresses the proper handling of indices in the context of tensor transformations, specifically using the notation of the Lorentz transformation matrix, denoted as \(\Lambda^{\mu}_{\;\;\nu}\). The user identifies an error in their manipulation of indices, particularly in the expression \(\Lambda^{\mu}_{\;\;\nu}\Lambda_{\bar{\nu}}^{\;\;\mu}\) and its relation to partial derivatives. The correct formulation, as established in the discussion, is \(\Lambda_{\mu}^{\;\;\nu}\Lambda_{\alpha}^{\;\;\beta}=\frac{\partial x'^\nu}{\partial x^{\mu}}\frac{\partial x'^{\beta}}{\partial x^{\alpha}}\), which adheres to standard conventions for raising and lowering indices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation and transformations
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives in the context of coordinate transformations
  • Basic principles of index notation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Learn about the Einstein summation convention and its applications
  • Explore the implications of raising and lowering indices in tensor calculus
  • Investigate the role of partial derivatives in differential geometry
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying general relativity or advanced mechanics who need to understand tensor calculus and index manipulation.

anony
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I always seem to have a problem with my indices...

[tex]\Lambda^{\mu}_{\;\;\nu}\Lambda_{\bar{\nu}}^{\;\;\mu}= \frac{\partial x'^{\nu}}{\partial x^{\mu}} \frac{\partial x_{\bar{\nu}}'}{\partial x_{\mu}}[/tex]

Now, the first term I'm relatively sure is right (first lambad corresponds to first of the derivatives on RHS. That second one seems completely wrong. Where do I get it from?

[tex] \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{\bar{\nu}} } = \frac{\partial x_{\mu}'}{\partial x_{\bar{\nu}}} \frac{\partial }{\partial x_{\mu}'} = \Lambda_{\mu}^{\;\;{\bar{\nu}}} \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{\mu}' } [/tex]

What am I doing wrong?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That the LHS is wrong you can see because the <mu> is not sitting once 'downstairs' and other time 'upstairs'. So the LHS should have its first term with the <mu> 'downstairs' (SE) and the <nu> 'upstairs' (NW).
 
Yes, with the partial derivatives, when the index is low in the denominator, that corresponds to a raised index, and visa versa.

anony said:
[tex]\Lambda^{\mu}_{\;\;\nu}\Lambda_{\bar{\nu}}^{\;\;\mu}= \frac{\partial x'^{\nu}}{\partial x^{\mu}} \frac{\partial x_{\bar{\nu}}'}{\partial x_{\mu}}[/tex]

This would be the appropriate way to do this, and this is standard convention

[tex]\Lambda_{\mu}^{\;\;\nu}\Lambda_{\alpha}^{\;\;\beta}=\frac{\partial x'^\nu}{\partial x^{\mu}}\frac{\partial x'^{\beta}}{\partial x^{\alpha}}[/tex]

If you want them summed, then you have to make the [itex]\beta[/itex] into a [itex]\mu[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K