Solving Indices Problem in QFT

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter anony
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indices Qft
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
anony
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I always seem to have a problem with my indices...

[tex]\Lambda^{\mu}_{\;\;\nu}\Lambda_{\bar{\nu}}^{\;\;\mu}= \frac{\partial x'^{\nu}}{\partial x^{\mu}} \frac{\partial x_{\bar{\nu}}'}{\partial x_{\mu}}[/tex]

Now, the first term I'm relatively sure is right (first lambad corresponds to first of the derivatives on RHS. That second one seems completely wrong. Where do I get it from?

[tex] \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{\bar{\nu}} } = \frac{\partial x_{\mu}'}{\partial x_{\bar{\nu}}} \frac{\partial }{\partial x_{\mu}'} = \Lambda_{\mu}^{\;\;{\bar{\nu}}} \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{\mu}' } [/tex]

What am I doing wrong?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That the LHS is wrong you can see because the <mu> is not sitting once 'downstairs' and other time 'upstairs'. So the LHS should have its first term with the <mu> 'downstairs' (SE) and the <nu> 'upstairs' (NW).
 
Yes, with the partial derivatives, when the index is low in the denominator, that corresponds to a raised index, and visa versa.

anony said:
[tex]\Lambda^{\mu}_{\;\;\nu}\Lambda_{\bar{\nu}}^{\;\;\mu}= \frac{\partial x'^{\nu}}{\partial x^{\mu}} \frac{\partial x_{\bar{\nu}}'}{\partial x_{\mu}}[/tex]

This would be the appropriate way to do this, and this is standard convention

[tex]\Lambda_{\mu}^{\;\;\nu}\Lambda_{\alpha}^{\;\;\beta}=\frac{\partial x'^\nu}{\partial x^{\mu}}\frac{\partial x'^{\beta}}{\partial x^{\alpha}}[/tex]

If you want them summed, then you have to make the [itex]\beta[/itex] into a [itex]\mu[/itex].