MHB Solving Inequality Problem: Proving Radical Expressions with Cube Roots

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove $\sqrt[3]{1−12\sqrt[3]{65^2} + 48\sqrt[3]{65}} -\sqrt[3]{63}\gt \sqrt[3]{1−48\sqrt[3]{63} + 36\sqrt[3]{147}} -4 $
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Prove $\sqrt[3]{1−12\sqrt[3]{65^2} + 48\sqrt[3]{65}} -\sqrt[3]{63}\gt \sqrt[3]{1−48\sqrt[3]{63} + 36\sqrt[3]{147}} -4 $

first let us simplify LHS
$\sqrt[3]{1−12\sqrt[3]{65^2} + 48\sqrt[3]{65}}$
this appears to be a cube whose cube root is of the form
$a\sqrt[3]{65}-b$
cube it to get
$65a^3 - 3a^2\sqrt[3]{65^2}b+3ab^2\sqrt[3]{65}-b^3 = 1−12\sqrt[3]{65^2} + 48\sqrt[3]{65}$
compare both sides to get
$3a^2b= 12$
$3ab^2 = 48$
giving a = 1 and b= 4
but we need to check the rational part
65* 1^3 - 4^3 = 1 so it is correct and hence

LHS becomes

$\sqrt[3]{1−12\sqrt[3]{65^2} + 48\sqrt[3]{65}}- \sqrt[3]{63} = \sqrt[3]{65}-4 - \sqrt[3]{63}\cdots(1)$

similarly trying the RHS with $a\sqrt[3]{7}-b\sqrt[3]{3}$ and failing and the trying with $a- \sqrt[3]{63}$
we get the RHS as
$\sqrt[3]{1−48\sqrt[3]{63} + 36\sqrt[3]{147}} -4=4- \sqrt[3]{63}- 4\cdots(2)$

hence from (1) and(2) we get the result
 
Last edited:
Well done kaliprasad.

My solution:
Rewrite the inequality as $∛(1−12∛65² + 48∛65)+4\gt ∛(1−48∛63 + 36∛147)+∛63$.

If we can prove LHS is greater than $4$ and RHS equals $4$, then we are done.

First, note that $1−12∛65² + 48∛65=∛65³-3(∛65)(∛64)(∛65-∛64)-∛64³=(∛65-∛64)^3>0$, so it must be true that $LHS=∛(1−12∛65² + 48∛65)+4>4$.

Next, note that $∛(1−48∛63 + 36∛147)=∛(∛64³-3(∛64)(∛63)(∛64-∛63)-∛63³)=∛(∛64-∛63)³=∛64-∛63=4-∛63$, that suggests $RHS=∛(1−48∛63 + 36∛147) + ∛63=4$, this completes the proof.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top