Solving Laplace equations, electrostatics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving Laplace's equations in electrostatics for two geometries: a conducting sphere and a cylindrical conducting can. For the sphere of radius R with a potential \Phi(R)=\Phi_0cos\theta, the potential inside is derived as \Phi(r,\theta)=\frac{\Phi_0R^2}{r^2}cos\theta. For the cylindrical can, the general solution involves Bessel functions and requires careful application of boundary conditions, specifically ensuring that the potential is finite at r=0 and zero at z=0. The discussion emphasizes the importance of boundary conditions in determining coefficients in the solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace's equation: \nabla^2\Phi=0
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and boundary conditions
  • Knowledge of cylindrical coordinates and Bessel functions
  • Concept of electrostatic potential in conductors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of boundary conditions in solving Laplace's equation
  • Learn about Bessel functions and their role in cylindrical coordinate problems
  • Explore the uniqueness theorem for solutions to Laplace's equation
  • Investigate the physical implications of electrostatic potentials in conductors
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those specializing in electrostatics, mathematical physics, and boundary value problems in partial differential equations.

Brian-san
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a) Consider a conducting sphere of radius R whose surface is maintained at a potential \Phi(R)=\Phi_0cos\theta. Assuming that there are no charges present (inside or outside), what is the potential inside and outside the sphere?

b) Consider a cylindrical conducting can of radius R and height h. The side and the bottom walls of the can are grounded while the top face is maintained at \Phi_0(r,\phi). Find the electrostatic potential inside the can.

Homework Equations


Laplace Equation
\nabla^2\Phi=0

The Attempt at a Solution


For part a, we already derived the general solution for spherical coordinates in class. The boundary condition seems to imply symmetry in the azimuthal angle. So the general solution is given by
\Phi(r,\theta)=\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}\left(A_lr^l+\frac{B_l}{r^{l+1}}\right)P_l(cos\theta)

If we assume that the potential goes to zero at infinity, then all A_l=0. Furthermore, B_l=0, l\geq2 as, we need only a cosine term at r=R. The solution is then found by plugging in the boundary condition, so
\Phi_0cos\theta=\frac{B_0}{R}+\frac{B_1}{R^2}cos\theta

From this, B_0=0, B_1=\Phi_0R^2 and the specific solution is given by
\Phi(r,\theta)=\frac{\Phi_0R^2}{r^2}cos\theta

I put this expression back into the Laplace equation and got zero, and it satisfies the boundary condition, so I believe must be the correct solution. The only piece I'm not sure of is using the fact that the potential is zero at infinity.

For part b, I located the general solution in cylindrical coordinates, which is
\Phi(r,\phi,z)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(A_nJ_n(kr)+B_nN_n(kr)\right)\left(C_nsin(n\phi)+D_ncos(n\phi)\right)\left(E_nsinh(kz)+F_ncosh(kz)\right)

Mathematically, the boundary conditions are represented as
\Phi(r\leq R,\phi,z=0)=0, \Phi(r=R,\phi,0<z<h)=0, \Phi(r,\phi,z=h)=\Phi_0(r,\phi)

I'm not exactly sure how to apply the boundary conditions in this problem, as I've never encountered the Bessel functions before, which appear in the radial part of the solution. I think the boundary condition at z=0 implies C_n=0, n\geq 0, D_n=0, n\geq 1 since the potential is zero for all angles, so then
\Phi(r,\phi,z)=\left(A_1J_1(kr)+B_1N_1(kr)\right)\left(D_1F_1cosh(kz)\right)

I'm not sure if this step is right, so how would I proceed from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Brian-san said:
\Phi(r,\theta)=\frac{\Phi_0R^2}{r^2}cos\theta

I put this expression back into the Laplace equation and got zero, and it satisfies the boundary condition, so I believe must be the correct solution. The only piece I'm not sure of is using the fact that the potential is zero at infinity.

This is fine for the potential outside the sphere.What about the potential inside?

For part b, I located the general solution in cylindrical coordinates, which is
\Phi(r,\phi,z)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(A_nJ_n(kr)+B_nN_n(kr)\right)\left(C_nsin(n\phi)+D_ncos(n\phi)\right)\left(E_nsinh(kz)+F_ncosh(kz)\right)

Mathematically, the boundary conditions are represented as
\Phi(r\leq R,\phi,z=0)=0, \Phi(r=R,\phi,0<z<h)=0, \Phi(r,\phi,z=h)=\Phi_0(r,\phi)

You also require that \Phi be finite everywhere, including at r=0...what does that tell you about B_n?

I'm not exactly sure how to apply the boundary conditions in this problem, as I've never encountered the Bessel functions before, which appear in the radial part of the solution. I think the boundary condition at z=0 implies C_n=0, n\geq 0, D_n=0, n\geq 1 since the potential is zero for all angles, so then
\Phi(r,\phi,z)=\left(A_1J_1(kr)+B_1N_1(kr)\right)\left(D_1F_1cosh(kz)\right)

I'm not sure why you think this...plugging z=0 into your expression does not give \Phi=0 for all 0\leq r\leq R except for the trivial case A_1=B_1=0.

Instead, plug z=0 into your general solution and you should realize that F_n=0 is the only way the potential will be zero for all \phi and all 0\leq r\leq R.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K