Solving Laplacian Operators and DEs

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hertz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curious
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving differential equations involving the Laplacian operator, specifically focusing on the equation \(\nabla^2 U(\vec{r})=C(\vec{r})U(\vec{r})\) and its one-dimensional counterpart \(\frac{d^2}{dx^2}U(x)=C(x)U(x)\). Participants explore methods for finding solutions and the implications of different forms of the function \(C\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in tackling the general equation and seeks to understand the one-dimensional case better.
  • Another participant inquires about the form of the Laplacian operator in spherical or polar coordinates, suggesting a potential avenue for exploration.
  • A later reply proposes starting with the case where \(C\) is constant, which leads to the Helmholtz equation.
  • Another suggestion involves assuming boundary conditions for \(U\) and the sign of \(C\), recommending integration by parts to progress in solving the equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on the best approach to solve the equations, and multiple strategies are being discussed without resolution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about boundary conditions and the nature of the function \(C\), which may affect the solvability of the equations. Specific mathematical steps remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in mathematical methods for solving differential equations, particularly those involving the Laplacian operator and boundary value problems, may find this discussion relevant.

Hertz
Messages
180
Reaction score
8
Hi, lately I've been messing around a lot with the Laplacian operator and DE's including the Laplacian operator. Most recently, the equation below is the one I have been messing around with and trying to understand better.

[itex]\nabla^2 U(\vec{r})=C(\vec{r})U(\vec{r})[/itex]

This is pretty general though.. WAYY too general for me to tackle. So I've been starting with the 1D case, which I also can't seem to solve.

[itex]\frac{d^2}{dx^2}U(x)=C(x)U(x)[/itex]

My goal is to try to solve for U(x) in terms of C(x). Any ideas? Is there any way to know if such a solution exists? What about to the general equation above?

Thanks :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the form of the Laplacian operator in spherical or polar coordinates
 
No I don't but it wouldn't be too much of a hassle to figure it out. How could that help though?
 
A couple of thoughts for progressing.

1) Try the case where C is constant. This actually gives you a Helmholtz equation.

2) For the more general case, it helps to assume that U or U dot n =0 at the boundary and C has a certain sign.
Then multiply by U and integrate over the domain, this will involve an integration by parts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K