MHB Solving Linear Systems with "m Equations & n Unknowns

delgeezee
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
My book describes a linear system with "m equations in n unknowns."

Maybe this is a subtle detail but this confuses me. Shouldn't it be the other way around, "n unknowns in m equations?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: terminology

It makes no difference, so long as m and n are defined.
 
Re: terminology

They both mean the same thing as far as I can tell. I think this may be a language problem, the first form might be more natural in english whereas the other sounds more natural in other languages (for instance french).​
 
Re: terminology

I'd write the first form as "m equations with n unknowns."
Anyway, the two forms mean the same thing.
 
Re: terminology

Like others said the variable names can be whatever you want to use, but standard convention is that a matrix of size $m \times n$ corresponds to a linear system of equations, which means that there are $m$ rows and $n$ columns. That corresponds to $m$ equations and $n$ variables.
 

Thread 'Trouble understanding an online solution to an exercise in Dummit & Foote'

##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
View full post »

Thread 'Questions about non existence of GCDs vs (coimages, cokernels)'

The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
View full post »

Thread '##(A/\mathfrak{a})_{\mathfrak{p}/\mathfrak{a}}## and its isomorphism?'

I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Gaussian elimination for homogeneous linear systems
Replies
26
Views
5K
I Solving a complex linear system with parameters
Replies
11
Views
2K
B What unique contributions to math did linear algebra make?
Replies
19
Views
3K
I Wronskian: null space equals the span of independent functions
Replies
23
Views
1K
MHB Solving Linear Equations: $Ax=b$ and Rank of A
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Dimension and solution to matrix-vector product
Replies
4
Views
3K
I Linear least squares regression for model matrix identification
Replies
5
Views
2K
Infinite solutions to homogeneous system?
Replies
2
Views
6K
MHB Linear system of equations: Echelon form/Solutions
Replies
3
Views
1K
MHB Homogeneous, underdetermined equation system
Replies
9
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top