MHB Solving Linear Systems with "m Equations & n Unknowns

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the terminology used to describe linear systems, specifically "m equations in n unknowns" versus "n unknowns in m equations." Participants agree that both phrases convey the same concept as long as m and n are clearly defined. The preference for one form over the other may stem from language differences, with the first form being more natural in English. Standard convention in mathematics describes a matrix of size m x n as having m rows (equations) and n columns (unknowns). Ultimately, clarity in definition is key, regardless of the phrasing used.
delgeezee
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
My book describes a linear system with "m equations in n unknowns."

Maybe this is a subtle detail but this confuses me. Shouldn't it be the other way around, "n unknowns in m equations?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: terminology

It makes no difference, so long as m and n are defined.
 
Re: terminology

They both mean the same thing as far as I can tell. I think this may be a language problem, the first form might be more natural in english whereas the other sounds more natural in other languages (for instance french).​
 
Re: terminology

I'd write the first form as "m equations with n unknowns."
Anyway, the two forms mean the same thing.
 
Re: terminology

Like others said the variable names can be whatever you want to use, but standard convention is that a matrix of size $m \times n$ corresponds to a linear system of equations, which means that there are $m$ rows and $n$ columns. That corresponds to $m$ equations and $n$ variables.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K