MHB Solving Linear Systems with "m Equations & n Unknowns

delgeezee
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
My book describes a linear system with "m equations in n unknowns."

Maybe this is a subtle detail but this confuses me. Shouldn't it be the other way around, "n unknowns in m equations?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: terminology

It makes no difference, so long as m and n are defined.
 
Re: terminology

They both mean the same thing as far as I can tell. I think this may be a language problem, the first form might be more natural in english whereas the other sounds more natural in other languages (for instance french).​
 
Re: terminology

I'd write the first form as "m equations with n unknowns."
Anyway, the two forms mean the same thing.
 
Re: terminology

Like others said the variable names can be whatever you want to use, but standard convention is that a matrix of size $m \times n$ corresponds to a linear system of equations, which means that there are $m$ rows and $n$ columns. That corresponds to $m$ equations and $n$ variables.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top